Argument by Analogy
Argument by Analogy
复制标题
类比论证
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
André Juthe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
André Juthe
在这篇文章中，我通过类比来描述论点，类比在哲学和日常推理中都有重要的作用。类比论证不同于一般的归纳论证或演绎论证，有其鲜明的特点。我试图描述这些论点的结构和功能。本文还进一步讨论了一些论点，这些论点不是通过类推而明确的论点，但应该解释为明确的论点，而不是归纳或演绎论点。其结果是，一场哲学纠纷的假定结果将不得不重新考虑。
In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.