Cortisol secretion throughout the day, perceptions of the work environment, and negative affect

Cortisol secretion throughout the day, perceptions of the work environment, and negative affect
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/bf02895668
复制
发表时间:
2000-09-01
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Godaert, GLR
Godaert, GLR
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hanson, EKS;Maas, CJM;Godaert, GLR

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

从工作压力模型(努力-回报不平衡模型)的解释变量对唾液皮质醇的影响进行了评估。多水平分析用于区分工作压力的单次和多次测量的影响和影响皮质醇。单一(或横截面)因素包括努力-回报不平衡(ERI),控制负性情绪的需要,以及其他持久因素(职业类型,性别和吸烟)。多场合测量包括瞬时负面情绪,瞬时需求满意度比率(MD-SR),睡眠质量,工作负荷(工作日与休息日)在工作中(与不在工作场所)。还有午餐一天中的时间对皮质醇的影响在这些变量的影响被确定之前被控制。瞬时的消极情绪而不是特质消极情绪与动态测量的皮质醇呈正相关。工作压力模型中的变量努力、控制的奖励需求和需求臂满意度的多场合测量并不影响皮质醇。正如预期的那样,一天中的时间对皮质醇有影响,但没有发现与瞬间消极情绪的假设相互作用。此外,结果表明,皮质醇的时间过程因人而异,睡眠质量对皮质醇的影响因人而异。这表明有必要继续努力,以挑选出的个体variability.The发现,来自努力-回报不平衡模型的变量与皮质醇不相关的假设,ERI借给短期变化的皮质醇,表明没有关系与下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的活动。另一方面,目前的研究结果邀请进一步资格的负面影响作为一个潜在的决定因素的HPA活动,至少可以推断出从皮质醇测量。
The effects of explanatory variables derived from a work stress model (the effort-reward imbalance model) on salivary cortisol were assessed A multilevel analysis was used to distinguish the effects of single occasion and multiple occasion measurements of work stress and effect an cortisol. The single (or cross-sectional) factors include Effort-Reward imbalance (ERI), need for control negative affect, and other enduring factors (type of occupation, gender and smoking). The multiple occasion measurements include momentary negative mood, Momentary Demand-Satisfaction Ratio (MD-SR), sleep quality, work load (workday versus day off) at work (versus not being at the workplace). and lunch. The effect of time of day on cortisol was controlled for before the effects of these variables were determined.Momentary negative mood but not trait negative affect was positively associated with ambulatory measured cortisol. The variables from the work stress model-effort, reward need for control, and the multiple occasion measurements of demand arm satisfaction-did not affect cortisol. As could be expected, time of day had an effect on cortisol ,but a hypothesised interaction with momentary negative mood was not found. Additionally, the results show that the time course of cortisol differs between individuals and that the effect of sleep quality on cortisol can vary from person to person. This points to the necessity of continued efforts to single out sources of individual variability.The finding that variables derived from the effort-reward imbalance model are not related with cortisol does not support the hypothesis that ERI lends to short-term changes in cortisol, indicating no relation with hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. On the other hand the present results invite further qualification of negative affect as a potential determinant of HPA activity at least, as far as can be deduced from cortisol measurements.