A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning
A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819
复制
发表时间：
1986-04
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
P. Tetlock
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Tetlock
测试了价值多元主义模型，该模型认为人们可能会以综合复杂的方式思考一个问题域，这个问题域激活了人们认为（a）重要和（B）几乎同等重要的冲突价值观。由145名本科生认可的价值等级之间的关系（由罗基奇价值调查测量）和政策偏好，他们表示的问题，旨在激活不同对基本的社会/政治价值观之间的冲突（例如，一个人是否愿意支付更高的税收，以帮助穷人的问题激活之间的冲突关心个人繁荣和社会平等）。回归分析表明，（a）政策偏好可以最好地预测从知识的冲突的值Ss认为更重要的和（B）的综合复杂性的人的推理的政策问题可以最好地预测从知识的相似性的重要性排名的冲突的值，平均重要性排名的2个冲突的值，和这2个术语的相互作用。本文的结论是，价值多元主义模型提供了一个灵活的理论框架，预测意识形态问题的互动在内容和结构的政策推理。(43参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Tested the value pluralism model, which asserts that people are likely to think about an issue domain in integratively complex ways to the degree that issue domain activates conflicting values that people perceive as (a) important and (b) approximately equally important. The relations between the value hierarchies endorsed by 145 undergraduates (measured by the Rokeach Value Survey) and the policy preferences they expressed on issues designed to activate conflicts between different pairs of basic social/political values (eg, the question of whether one is willing to pay higher taxes to assist the poor activates a conflict between concern for personal prosperity and social equality). Regression analyses revealed that (a) policy preferences could be best predicted from knowledge of which of the conflicting values Ss deemed more important and (b) the integrative complexity of people's reasoning about policy issues could be best predicted from knowledge of the similarity of the importance rankings of the conflicting values, the mean importance ranking of the 2 conflicting values, and the interaction of these 2 terms. It is concluded that the value pluralism model provides a flexible theoretical framework for predicting Ideology Issue interactions in both the content and structure of policy reasoning.(43 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)