An Ecological Validation of Social Cognitive Development.
An Ecological Validation of Social Cognitive Development.
复制标题
社会认知发展的生态验证。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02521.x
复制
发表时间：
1980
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Sara J. Sutterfield
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Enright;Sara J. Sutterfield
罗伯特·恩赖特Sutterfield，SARA J.，《社会认知发展的生态验证》。《儿童发展》，1980年，第51卷，第156-161页。两个教室的一年级学生（N = 40）进行了达蒙的道德判断措施，舒尔和斯皮瓦克的社会问题解决措施，和斯坦福-比奈词汇。同时，2名观察员记录了儿童在学校环境中成功解决互动问题的发生率、减损的程度以及同龄人接近儿童的次数。一个积极的关系预测之间的道德发展和成功的频率，成功的比例，以及儿童被别人接近的次数。预测道德和频率的不成功的反应，这种反应的比例，和减损之间的负相关关系。同样的预测也适用于社会问题解决和行为变量。词汇是判别性认知变量，因此没有关系的行为进行了预测。结果证实了正相关关系的道德变量的成功率和时间量S接近同行。此外，预测的负面关系之间的道德变量和比例的失败结果举行。当词汇被排除在外时，这些关系并不适用于解决社会问题的推理。正如预期的那样，词汇量与胜任的社会行为无关。结果支持道德判断作为一个生态有效的社会认知结构。
ENRIGHT, ROBERT D., and SUTTERFIELD, SARA J. An Ecological Validation of Social Cognitive Development. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 51, 156-161. 2 classrooms of first graders (N = 40) were administered Damon's moral judgment measure, Shure and Spivack's social problem solving measure, and the Stanford-Binet vocabulary. Concurrently, 2 observers recorded in the children's school environment incidences of successful resolutions of interactions, amount of derogation, and the number of times a child was approached by peers. A positive relationship was predicted between moral development and frequency of success, proportion of success, and amount of times the child was approached by others. Negative relationships were predicted between morality and frequency of unsuccessful responses, proportion of such responses, and derogation. The same predictions were made for social problem solving and the behavioral variables. Vocabulary was the discriminant cognitive variable, thus no relationship to behavior was predicted. Results confirmed the positive relationship of the moral variable with proportion of successes and amount of time S was approached by peers. Further, the predicted negative relationship between the moral variable and proportion of unsuccessful outcomes held. When vocabulary was partialled out, these relationships did not hold for social problem solving reasoning. As expected, vocabulary did not relate to competent social behavior. The results support moral judgment as an ecologically valid social cognitive construct.