The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research
The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research
复制标题
帕尔格雷夫创造力与文化研究手册
DOI：
10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_33
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Higgins D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Higgins D
这一合写的章节借鉴了作者的个人研究以及他们在创意社区(1750-1830)研究网络上的合作。这一时期传统上与创造性和文化之间的关系的心理学和个人化范式相联系，因此提供了一个特别丰富的地形，可以更多地以社区和背景的方式来思考这种关系。我们讨论了从网络中出现的一些关键发现：最重要的是，批判性关注创造力的价值体现在过程和互动中，而不是个别产品。这并不意味着我们在个案研究中忽视了文学文本本身，而是我们关心文本如何编码自己的生产过程。因此，John Whale展示了Roscoe的Lorenzo de‘Medici的生活中对米开朗基罗的描述如何反映了天才的交流属性，以暗示文艺复兴时期的法国和浪漫主义时期的利物浦之间的相似之处；Cassandra Ulph研究了Piozzi的Samuel Johnson轶事如何同时承认并削弱了主题的独白倾向；David Higgins讨论了Mary Shelley的Frankenstein如何利用她与Percy Byshe Shelley的阿尔卑斯山合作，同时自觉地提供了他作品中以人类为中心的崇高的替代方案。
This co-written chapter draws on its authors’ individual research as well as their collaboration on the Creative Communities, 1750–1830 research network. This time period has traditionally been associated with a psychological and individualised paradigm of the relationship between creativity and culture, and therefore offers a particularly rich terrain for thinking about the relationship in much more communal and contextual ways. We discuss some of the key findings to emerge from the network: most importantly, the value of a critical focus on creativity as embodied in process and interaction rather than individual product. This does not mean that the literary text itself is neglected in our case studies, but rather that we are concerned with how texts encode their own productive processes. Thus, John Whale shows how the account of Michelangelo in Roscoe’s Life of Lorenzo de’ Medici reflects on the communicative properties of genius to suggest a parallel between Renaissance France and Romantic-period Liverpool; Cassandra Ulph examines how Piozzi’s Anecdotes of Samuel Johnson simultaneously acknowledges and undercuts its subject’s tendency to monologue; and David Higgins discusses how Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein draws on her Alpine collaboration with Percy Bysshe Shelley while self-consciously offering an alternative to the anthropocentric sublimity of his work.