What developmental scientists have contributed working within ecological psychology and transactionalism.

What developmental scientists have contributed working within ecological psychology and transactionalism.
复制标题

发展科学家在生态心理学和交易主义领域做出了哪些贡献。

DOI:
10.1002/dev.10106
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
Developmental psychobiology.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Walker-Andrews,ArleneS
Walker-Andrews,ArleneS
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Walker-Andrews,ArleneS

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对JB Wagman和DB Miller的论文的评论(见记录2003-00243-002),其中Wagman和Miller提出了EJ和JJ Gibson(例如,EJ Gibson, 1984; EJ Gibson和Pick, 2000; JJ Gibson, 1950, 1966, 1979)与DS Lehrman提出的交易方法之间的一些联系。Wagman和Miller指出,Gibson和Lehrman都将生物-环境系统置于研究的中心。现任作者认为,Wagman和Miller没有认识到JJ和EJ Gibson的学生和同事进行的研究的数量和广度,也没有利用这些发现来说明,着眼于功能主义和生态心理学的研究如何能够更好地理解行为。Wagman和Miller似乎将“发展科学家”的使用限制在那些在生物学中采取交易方法的人身上,但是发展科学领域是跨学科的。目前的作者希望使发展科学家对行为研究以及生态和交易方法的有效性的贡献更加明确。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2016 APA,版权所有)
Comments on the paper by JB Wagman and DB Miller (see record 2003-00243-002) in which Wagman and Miller made a case for a number of connections between the theories of ecological psychology as formulated by EJ and JJ Gibson (eg, EJ Gibson, 1984; EJ Gibson and Pick, 2000; JJ Gibson, 1950, 1966, 1979) and the transactional approach proposed by DS Lehrman. Wagman and Miller point out that both Gibson and Lehrman placed the organism-environment system at the center of inquiry. The current author suggests that Wagman and Miller fail to recognize the number and breadth of studies conducted by students and colleagues of JJ and EJ Gibson who study development, and to use such findings to illustrate how research undertaken with an eye to functionalism and ecological psychology can lead to a greater understanding of behavior. Wagman and Miller seem to have limited their use of" development scientist" to those who take a transactional approach in biology, but the field of developmental science is intradisciplinary. The current author hopes to make the contributions of developmental scientists to both the study of behavior and to the efficacy of ecological and transactional approaches more explicit.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)