Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Furosemide Among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study.
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Furosemide Among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ekir.2022.07.003
复制
发表时间:
2022-10
影响因子:
6
通讯作者:
Dember, Laura M.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Flythe, Jennifer E.;Assimon, Magdalene M.;Tugman, Matthew J.;Narendra, Julia H.;Singh, Simran K.;Jin, Wanting;Li, Quefeng;Bansal, Nisha;Hostetter, Thomas H.;Dember, Laura M.
Diuretic use may reduce volume-related complications in hemodialysis. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of furosemide in patients with hemodialysis-dependent kidney failure. We conducted an open label, single-arm, 18-week, dose titration pilot study of oral furosemide (maximum dose 320 mg/day) among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who reported at least 1 cup of urine output per day. The primary efficacy outcome was an increase from baseline to a specified threshold of 24-hour urine volume, with the threshold based on baseline urine volume (<200 ml/day vs. ≥200 ml/day). Safety outcomes included hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, and tolerability was assessed by prespecified patient-reported symptoms. Of the 39 participants, 28 (72%) received the expected furosemide dose, 3 (8%) underwent dose reduction, 5 (12%) discontinued furosemide without dose reduction, and 3 (8%) underwent dose reduction and subsequently discontinued furosemide. The median (quartile 1, quartile 3) baseline 24-hour urine volume was 290 ml (110, 740), and the maximum, average daily study furosemide dose ranged from 69 mg/day to 320 mg/d. The urine output efficacy outcome was met by 12 (33%), 11 (33%), and 7 (22%) participants at weeks 5, 12, and 18, respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis, and by 12 (39%), 9 (35%), and 7 (28%) participants at weeks 5, 12, and 18, respectively, in the on-treatment analysis. There were no electrolyte, furosemide level, or patient-reported hearing change safety events. Furosemide was generally safe and well tolerated, but only one-third of participants met the efficacy definition at week 5. The clinical importance of the efficacy findings is uncertain.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Jessen, Annika;Ho, Andrew D.;Shin, Jennifer J.
通讯作者:
Shin, Jennifer J.
影响因子:
1.6
作者:
Moledina, Dennis G.;Wilson, Francis Perry
通讯作者:
Wilson, Francis Perry
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
St Peter, Wendy L.;Sozio, Stephen M.;Boulware, L. Ebony
通讯作者:
Boulware, L. Ebony
影响因子:
19.6
作者:
VOELKER, JR;CARTWRIGHTBROWN, D;BRATER, DC
通讯作者:
BRATER, DC
DOI:
10.2215/cjn.07670618
发表时间:
2019-01-07
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Flythe, Jennifer E.;Hilliard, Tandrea;Mehrotra, Rajnish
通讯作者:
Mehrotra, Rajnish