Conflict and engagement: An empirical study of a farmer-extension partnership in a sustainable agriculture program
Conflict and engagement: An empirical study of a farmer-extension partnership in a sustainable agriculture program
复制标题
冲突与参与：可持续农业计划中农民与推广伙伴关系的实证研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nancy Grudens‐Schuck
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nancy Grudens‐Schuck
利益相关者参与是推广教育的一个重要概念。参与通过为利益相关者提供机会来影响计划规划，包括制定议程和谈判资源分配，表达了土地授予任务的民主价值观。在实践中，参与的概念指导着推广、社区、行业和政府之间伙伴关系的形成。然而，在可持续农业领域，利益攸关方可能会发生冲突，给参与进程带来挑战。一项对加拿大可持续农业项目的研究结果，利用文化人类学和参与性行动研究产生，详细说明了导致重建农民推广伙伴关系的参与过程中的挑战。在重建进程的早期阶段，值得注意的是批判性思考、利益攸关方论坛、通过党团会议被排除在外以及建立联盟。对新语法主义者观点的论证为理解研究揭示的参与的反直觉维度提供了理论基础。
Stakeholder engagement is a crucial concept of extension education. Engagement expresses democratic values of the land-grant mission by providing opportunities for stakeholders to influence program planning, including setting the agenda and negotiating resource allocations. In practice, the concept of engagement guides the formation of partnerships among extension, communities, industry, and government. In the area of sustainable agriculture, however, stakeholders may conflict, presenting challenges to the engagement process. Results from a study of a Canadian sustainable agriculture program, produced using cultural anthropology and participatory action research, detail challenges of the engagement process that led to reconstruction of a farmer-extension partnership. Notable in the early phase of the reconstruction process were critical reflection, stakeholder forums, exclusion through caucusing, and coalition building. An argument for a neopragmatist view provides a theoretical basis for understanding counterintuitive dimensions of engagement revealed by the study.