Issues in parent-child agreement: The case of structured diagnostic interviews
Issues in parent-child agreement: The case of structured diagnostic interviews
复制标题
DOI：
10.1023/a:1014573708569
复制
发表时间：
2002-03-01
影响因子：
6.9
通讯作者：
Ollendick, TH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Grills, AE;Ollendick, TH
本次审查有三个主要目的。首先，审查区分三种类型的可靠性和描述的重要性，评估儿童精神病理学评估工具的临床实践和研究的可靠性。第二，亲子可靠性的结果，从5个更仔细研究和经常使用的结构化（半和高度）诊断访谈（学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症的时间表，儿童评估量表，焦虑障碍访谈时间表的儿童。儿童和青少年的诊断性访谈，以及儿童的诊断性访谈时间表）进行了检查。最后，本文探讨了影响亲子协议的因素，并对亲子协议的潜在影响进行了讨论。此外，还确定了这一领域的研究和临床实践的未来方向，并讨论了亲子不一致的难题的潜在解决方案。
There are three primary purposes of this review. First, the review distinguishes among three types of reliability and describes the importance of evaluating the reliability of child psychopathology assessment instruments for clinical practice and research. Second, parent-child reliability findings from 5 of the more carefully studied and frequently used Structured (semi and highly) diagnostic interviews (The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-age Children, The Child Assessment Scale, The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children. The Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents, and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children) are examined. Finally, this review explores factors that have been implicated in terms of their potential effect on parent-child agreement, In addition, future directions for research and clinical practice within this area are identified and potential resolutions to the conundrum of parent-child discordance are discussed.