Considerations of Autonomy in Guiding Decisions around the Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results from Genomics Research: Expectations of and Preferences from Researchers in Botswana.
Considerations of Autonomy in Guiding Decisions around the Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results from Genomics Research: Expectations of and Preferences from Researchers in Botswana.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1155/2022/3245206
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
de Vries J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kasule M;Matshaba M;Mwaka E;Wonkam A;de Vries J
The Human Health and Heredity (H3Africa) Consortium continues to generate large amounts of genomic data leading to new insights into health and disease among African populations. This has however generated debate among stakeholders involved in developing, implementing, and applying ethical standards and policies for the return of individual genetic research results. The key questions are about when results must, should, may, or must not be returned and by whom. This study aimed to explore the views on the feedback of individual pertinent and incidental genetic research results of researchers, ethics committee members, and policymakers in Botswana. In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 key stakeholders from academic, research institutions, and regulatory bodies in Botswana. An analysis of the coded data was done through an iterative process of analytic induction to document and interpret themes and patterns. Overall, the study indicated that researchers have at least a partial obligation to return individual genetic research results to research participants. Respondents placed emphasis on the ethical principle of autonomy. They felt that it was inappropriate for researchers to make decisions about the return of results on participants' behalf except in situations of avoiding participant self-harm or harm to society. Findings helped to highlight the importance of considering participants' autonomy in the development of sustainable and credible guidelines for feedback of findings from genomics research in Botswana, which can be explained during community engagement and consent processes. Such guidelines would ultimately be used to develop policies, guide African genomics research, and promote participant autonomy, transparency, and possibly participant trust in research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Cohen, Deborah A.;Han, Bing;Derose, Kathryn Pitkin;Williamson, Stephanie;Marsh, Terry;McKenzie, Thomas L.
通讯作者:
McKenzie, Thomas L.
影响因子:
7
作者:
Eberle, Michael A.;Fritzilas, Epameinondas;Bentley, David R.
通讯作者:
Bentley, David R.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Mulder NJ;Adebiyi E;Adebiyi M;Adeyemi S;Ahmed A;Ahmed R;Akanle B;Alibi M;Armstrong DL;Aron S;Ashano E;Baichoo S;Benkahla A;Brown DK;Chimusa ER;Fadlelmola FM;Falola D;Fatumo S;Ghedira K;Ghouila A;Hazelhurst S;Isewon I;Jung S;Kassim SK;Kayondo JK;Mbiyavanga M;Meintjes A;Mohammed S;Mosaku A;Moussa A;Muhammd M;Mungloo-Dilmohamud Z;Nashiru O;Odia T;Okafor A;Oladipo O;Osamor V;Oyelade J;Sadki K;Salifu SP;Soyemi J;Panji S;Radouani F;Souiai O;Tastan Bishop Ö;H3ABioNet Consortium, as members of the H3Africa Consortium
通讯作者:
H3ABioNet Consortium, as members of the H3Africa Consortium
影响因子:
0.9
作者:
Williams, J. R.
通讯作者:
Williams, J. R.
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Eckstein, Lisa;Garrett, Jeremy R.;Berkman, Benjamin E.
通讯作者:
Berkman, Benjamin E.