ADVANCES IN STRATEGIES FOR MINIMIZING AND ADJUSTING FOR SURVEY NONRESPONSE
ADVANCES IN STRATEGIES FOR MINIMIZING AND ADJUSTING FOR SURVEY NONRESPONSE
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036176
复制
发表时间:
1995-01-01
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
GROVES, RM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
KESSLER, RC;LITTLE, RJA;GROVES, RM
The decrease in survey response rates since the 1950s (1, 2) has sensitized survey researchers to the importance of studying the effects of nonresponse bias, of developing procedures to minimize the magnitude of nonresponse, and of adjusting survey estimates for nonresponse (3-5). This presentation reviews recent developments in these areas. The discussion addresses the problem of" unit" nonresponse (when a sampled individual is not surveyed at all) in face-to-face household surveys. For a broader discussion of unit nonresponse, see Groves (2). For a more general discussion of how to perform statistical analysis when data are missing, see Little and Rubin (4), Madow et al.(5), and Rubin (6). Unit nonresponse is a problem for at least two reasons: First, in a sample with a fixed number of predesignated cases, a reduction in unit response translates directly into a reduction in sample size, which reduces the precision of survey estimates. Second, unit nonresponse can lead to bias when respondents and nonrespondents differ systematically with respect to survey measures. Even if the response rate is high, this bias can be important if nonrespondents differ markedly from respondents in terms of rare outcomes. For example, even if the response rate in a mental health survey were 80 percent, the total sample prevalence of schizophrenia would be underestimated by a factor of 2 if the prevalence was 1 percent among survey respondents and 6 percent among nonrespondents. Two approaches to the reduction of nonresponse bias can be adopted. One is to use data collection strategies that reduce the nonresponse rate. The other is to collect information on all or a subset of the nonrespondents and incorporate this information into the sample estimates to reduce bias. A combination