Standardisation of elemental analytical techniques applied to provenance studies of archaeological ceramics:: an inter laboratory calibration study

Standardisation of elemental analytical techniques applied to provenance studies of archaeological ceramics:: an inter laboratory calibration study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1039/b109603f
复制
发表时间:
2002-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Kilikoglou, V
Kilikoglou, V
中科院分区:
化学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hein, A;Tsolakidou, A;Kilikoglou, V

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

化学分析是确定考古陶瓷来源的一个行之有效的程序。各种分析技术经常使用,迄今为止,数据库中已积累了大量数据。然而,为了交换不同实验室获得的结果,需要测试各自的分析程序的相互可比性。在这项研究中,在四个实验室,参与考古陶器研究的常规基础上使用的分析方案进行了比较。研究的技术是中子活化分析(NAA),X射线荧光分析(XRF),电感耦合等离子体发射光谱(ICP-OES)和电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)。为了进行这种比较,对不同的地质标准参考物质(SRM)进行了一系列的测量,并对结果进行了统计评估。还尝试建立成对分析装置之间的校准因子,以平滑结果之间的系统差异。
Chemical analysis is a well-established procedure for the provenancing of archaeological ceramics. Various analytical techniques are routinely used and large amounts of data have been accumulated so far in data banks. However, in order to exchange results obtained by different laboratories, the respective analytical procedures need to be tested in terms of their inter-comparability. In this study, the schemes of analysis used in four laboratories that are involved in archaeological pottery studies on a routine basis were compared. The techniques investigated were neutron activation analysis (NAA), X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). For this comparison series of measurements on different geological standard reference materials (SRM) were carried out and the results were statistically evaluated. An attempt was also made towards the establishment of calibration factors between pairs of analytical setups in order to smooth the systematic differences among the results.