‘‘Technische Universität Darmstadt’’

‘‘Technische Universität Darmstadt’’
复制标题

达姆施塔特工业大学

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Eidesstattliche Erklärung
Eidesstattliche Erklärung
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Eidesstattliche Erklärung

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

欧洲议会和理事会2001年5月22日关于协调信息社会中版权和相关权某些方面的第2001/29/EC号指令第5(3)(n)条中规定的“购买或许可条款”概念必须理解为要求权利人和机构,如公共图书馆,该条款所指的机构必须就有关作品签订许可协议,规定该机构可以使用该作品的条件。第2001/29号指令第5(3)(n)条,与该指令第5(2)(c)条一起理解,必须被解释为意味着它不排除成员国授予这些条款所涵盖的公共可访问图书馆数字化其馆藏作品的权利,如果这种复制行为对于向用户提供这些作品是必要的,在该等机构内使用专用终端机。第2001/29号指令第5(3)(n)条必须被解释为意味着它不延伸到用户从该条款所涵盖的公共访问图书馆安装的专用终端进行的在纸上打印作品或将作品存储在U盘上的行为。但是,如果适当,这些行为可以根据国家立法进行授权,并将该指令第5(2)(a)或(B)条中规定的例外或限制转移,前提是在每种情况下,这些规定所规定的条件得到满足。欧洲议会和理事会2001年5月22日关于协调信息社会中版权和相关权某些方面的第2001/29/EC号指令第5(3)(n)条中规定的“购买或许可条款”概念必须理解为要求权利人和机构,如公共图书馆,该条款所指的机构必须就有关作品签订许可协议,规定该机构可以使用该作品的条件。第2001/29号指令第5(3)(n)条,与该指令第5(2)(c)条一起理解,必须被解释为意味着它不排除成员国授予这些条款所涵盖的公共可访问图书馆数字化其馆藏作品的权利,如果这种复制行为对于向用户提供这些作品是必要的,在该等机构内使用专用终端机。第2001/29号指令第5(3)(n)条必须被解释为意味着它不延伸到用户从该条款所涵盖的公共访问图书馆安装的专用终端进行的在纸上打印作品或将作品存储在U盘上的行为。但是,如果适当,这些行为可以根据国家立法进行授权,并将该指令第5(2)(a)或(B)条中规定的例外或限制转移,前提是在每种情况下,这些规定所规定的条件得到满足。
The concept of ‘purchase or licensing terms’ provided for in Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be understood as requiring that the rightholder and an establishment, such as a publicly accessible library, referred to in that provision must have concluded a licensing agreement in respect of the work in question that sets out the conditions in which that establishment may use that work. Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29, read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c) of that directive, must be interpreted to mean that it does not preclude Member States from granting to publicly accessible libraries covered by those provisions the right to digitise the works contained in their collections, if such act of reproduction is necessary for the purpose of making those works available to users, by means of dedicated terminals, within those establishments. Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted to mean that it does not extend to acts such as the printing out of works on paper or their storage on a USB stick, carried out by users from dedicated terminals installed in publicly accessible libraries covered by that provision. However, such acts may, if appropriate, be authorised under national legislation transposing the exceptions or limitations provided for in Article 5(2)(a) or (b) of that directive provided that, in each individual case, the conditions laid down by those provisions are met. The concept of ‘purchase or licensing terms’ provided for in Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be understood as requiring that the rightholder and an establishment, such as a publicly accessible library, referred to in that provision must have concluded a licensing agreement in respect of the work in question that sets out the conditions in which that establishment may use that work. Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29, read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c) of that directive, must be interpreted to mean that it does not preclude Member States from granting to publicly accessible libraries covered by those provisions the right to digitise the works contained in their collections, if such act of reproduction is necessary for the purpose of making those works available to users, by means of dedicated terminals, within those establishments. Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted to mean that it does not extend to acts such as the printing out of works on paper or their storage on a USB stick, carried out by users from dedicated terminals installed in publicly accessible libraries covered by that provision. However, such acts may, if appropriate, be authorised under national legislation transposing the exceptions or limitations provided for in Article 5(2)(a) or (b) of that directive provided that, in each individual case, the conditions laid down by those provisions are met.