Moving Toward an Ideation-to-Action Framework in Suicide Research: A Commentary on.
Moving Toward an Ideation-to-Action Framework in Suicide Research: A Commentary on.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/cpsp.12134
复制
发表时间：
2016-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Alloy LB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Burke TA;Alloy LB
对Alexis M.梅和大卫E. Klonsky（见记录2016-07752-001）。鉴于缺乏证据来确定自杀意念者在实施自杀想法时的最大风险，目前的作者同意May和Klonsky的观点，即未来的自杀研究必须采用一个想法到行动的框架。现有的研究已经证明，两个常见的调查自杀行为的风险因素（如，精神病诊断），甚至在三个想法行动理论（如，获得能力）中强调的一些风险因素在确定群体成员资格时只有最小的影响大小。迫切需要确定新的因素，可以更有效地区分构想者和构想者，并应注意操作和测量的构想和行动。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021阿帕，保留所有权利）
Comments on an article by Alexis M. May and David E. Klonsky (see record 2016-07752-001). Given sparse evidence available to identify suicidal ideators at greatest risk for acting on their suicidal thoughts, the current authors agree with May and Klonsky that it will be imperative for future suicide research to employ an ideation-to-action framework. Extant research has evidenced that both commonly investigated risk factors for suicidal behavior (eg, psychiatric diagnoses) and even some of the risk factors highlighted in the three ideation-to-action theories (eg, acquired capability) have only minimal effect sizes in determining group membership. Novel factors urgently need to be identified that can more effectively distinguish between ideators and attempters, and care should be taken in operationalizing and measuring both ideation and action.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)