Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making
Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0033-295x.108.2.370
复制
发表时间：
2001-04-01
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
Townsend, JT
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Roe, RM;Busemeyer, JR;Townsend, JT
作者解释了决策场理论（J. R.布塞迈耶和J. T.汤森，1993年）作为连接主义网络，并将其扩展以适应多选择优先选择情况。这篇文章表明，经典的加权可加效用模型（见R。L. Keeney & H. Raiffa，1976）和经典的瑟斯顿偏好选择模型（见L。L. Thurstone，1959）是这种新的多选择决策域理论（MDFT）的特殊情况。它也可以模拟流行的方面消除（EBA）模型的搜索过程（见A. Tversky，1969）。新的理论是独特的，它能够解释几个中心的实证结果，发现在多选择偏好文献与一套共同的原则。这些实证结果包括相似效应、吸引效应。妥协效应，以及这三种效应之间的复杂互动。该模型的动态性质也意味着强有力的可检验的预测，关于这三个效果的时间压力的调节作用。
The authors interpret decision field theory (J. R. Busemeyer & J. T. Townsend, 1993) as a connectionist network and extend it to accommodate multialternative preferential choice situations. This article shows that the classic weighted additive utility model (see R. L. Keeney & H. Raiffa, 1976) and the classic Thurstone preferential choice model (see L. L. Thurstone, 1959) are special cases of this new multialternative decision field theory (MDFT). which also can emulate the search process of the popular elimination by aspects (EBA) model (see A. Tversky, 1969). The new theory is unique in its ability to explain several central empirical results found in the multialternative preference literature with a common set of principles. These empirical results include the similarity effect, the attraction effect. and the compromise effect, and the complex interactions among these three effects. The dynamic nature of the model also implies strong testable predictions concerning the moderating effect of time pressure on these three effects.