Questioning health security: Insecurity and domination in world politics

Questioning health security: Insecurity and domination in world politics
复制标题

质疑卫生安全:世界政治中的不安全与统治

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
João Nunes
João Nunes
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
João Nunes

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

健康保障的提法已经很常见,但后者的含义往往被认为是理所当然的。由于过分关注国家安全和精英们的安全努力,目前对这一概念的参与受到了限制。这导致人们越来越怀疑安全对于理解和帮助解决健康问题的潜力。受安全即解放思想的启发,本文对健康保障的概念进行了重新思考。它以个人所经历的具体不安全感为出发点,并通过以支配概念为中心的分析框架与他们接触。支配通过连接个人的不安全感体验、赋予这些体验意义的社会互动以及使它们成为可能的结构来深化分析。支配还扩大了分析范围,揭示了不安全的多面性。这一框架的分析益处体现在两个例子中:艾滋病毒/艾滋病;以及水和卫生。统治的透镜也显示出对全球卫生问题的政治参与带来好处。
Abstract It has become common to speak of health security, but the meaning of the latter is often taken for granted. Existing engagements with this notion have been constrained by an excessive focus on national security and on the securitising efforts of elites. This has led to an increasingly sceptical outlook on the potentialities of security for making sense of, and helping to tackle, health problems. Inspired by the idea of security as emancipation, this article reconsiders the notion of health security. It takes as its starting point the concrete insecurities experienced by individuals, and engages with them by way of an analytical framework centred on the notion of domination. Domination deepens analysis by connecting individual experiences of insecurity, the social interactions through which these are given meaning, and the structures that make them possible. Domination also broadens the remit of analysis, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of insecurity. The analytical benefits of this framework are demonstrated by two examples: HIV/AIDS; and water and sanitation. The lens of domination is also shown to bring benefits for the political engagement with global health problems.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Nunes
通讯作者: Nunes