Self-administered questionnaire versus interview as a screening method for intimate partner violence in the prenatal setting in Japan: a randomised controlled trial.

Self-administered questionnaire versus interview as a screening method for intimate partner violence in the prenatal setting in Japan: a randomised controlled trial.
复制标题

自我管理的问卷与访谈是日本产前环境中亲密伴侣暴力的筛查方法:一项随机对照试验。

DOI:
10.1186/1471-2393-10-84
复制
发表时间:
2010-12-24
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Horiuchi S
Horiuchi S
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kataoka Y;Yaju Y;Eto H;Horiuchi S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是日本一个严重的社会问题。为了开始对受虐待妇女进行有效干预,需要澄清在保健机构中筛查IPV的适当方法。本研究的目的是比较面对面访谈和自我管理问卷的有效性。我们使用日本的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)筛查工具——暴力侵害妇女筛查(VAWS)来识别遭受虐待的孕妇。我们在日本东京的一家产前诊所进行了一项随机对照试验,在三个时间点筛选参与者。有328名怀孕14到25周的女性被连续选择并随机分配到访谈组或自我调查问卷组。两组在怀孕期间都完成了三次相同的筛查工具。主要结果是通过每种筛查方法确定的妇女总数,次要结果是通过妇女的舒适程度和她们表达的与护士协商的需要来衡量筛查的效果。对于所有三种筛查,访谈组的识别率明显低于自我问卷组(相对风险0.66,95% CI 0.46至0.97),即使在控制吸烟后也是如此(校正优势比0.59,95% CI 0.35至0.98)。两组在次要结果上没有差异。在日本产前诊所筛查孕妇时,自我管理的问卷比面对面访谈更能识别IPV。UMIN-CTRC000000353
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious social issue in Japan. In order to start effective interventions for abused women, the appropriate method of screening for IPV in healthcare settings needs clarifying. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a face-to-face interview with a self-administered questionnaire. We used the Violence Against Women Screen (VAWS), a Japanese screening instrument for intimate partner violence (IPV), for identifying pregnant women who have experienced abuse. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to screen participants at three points in time in a prenatal clinic in Tokyo, Japan. There were 328 consenting women between 14 and 25 weeks of pregnancy who were consecutively selected and randomly assigned to either the interview or self-administered questionnaire group. Both groups completed the same screening instrument three times during their pregnancy. The primary outcome was the total number of women identified by each screening method and the secondary outcome was the effect of the screening as measured by the women's comfort level and their expressed need to consult with the nurse. For all three screenings, the identification rate in the interview group was significantly lower than that for the self-administered questionnaire group (relative risk 0.66, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.97), even after controlling for smoking (adjusted odds ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.98). The two groups did not differ for secondary outcomes. The self-administered questionnaire identified more IPV than the face-to-face interview when screening pregnant women in a Japanese prenatal clinic. UMIN-CTRC000000353
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199601000-00007
发表时间: 1996-01-01
期刊: NURSING RESEARCH
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
McFarlane, J;Parker, B;Soeken, K
通讯作者: Soeken, K
DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000110245.83404.3d
发表时间: 2004-02-01
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Webster, J;Holt, V
通讯作者: Holt, V
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1089
发表时间: 2009-08-05
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
MacMillan, Harriet L.;Wathen, C. Nadine;McNutt, Louise-Anne
通讯作者: McNutt, Louise-Anne
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.3.311
发表时间: 2006-03-01
影响因子: --
作者:
Bair-Merritt, MH;Feudtner, C;Fein, JA
通讯作者: Fein, JA
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.5.575
发表时间: 1990-05-01
影响因子: 12.7
作者:
AMARO, H;FRIED, LE;ZUCKERMAN, B
通讯作者: ZUCKERMAN, B