Urban Gardening and Green Space Governance: Towards New Collaborative Planning Practices

Urban Gardening and Green Space Governance: Towards New Collaborative Planning Practices
复制标题

城市园艺和绿地治理:迈向新的协作规划实践

DOI:
10.17645/up.v1i1.520
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Drilling
M. Drilling
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sofia Nikolaidou;Tanja Klöti;S. Tappert;M. Drilling

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在城市密集化和中心城区缺乏开放空间的背景下,出现了新形式的小规模城市园艺做法。这些园艺实践回应了城市压力,开启了绿色空间治理的新模式,为管理和振兴城市提供了替代性和多功能的方法。本文以日内瓦为例,展开了两个层次的讨论。一方面,并参考理论家哈贝马斯,它探讨了如何与不同利益的多个行动者相互作用和相互合作,以谈判开放的空间,同时讨论当地的政治和规划的影响。另一方面,它描述了这些谈判如何导致新的,创新的,混合形式的公共绿色空间。主要调查结果表明,出现了新的合作、伙伴关系和治理模式,涉及公共和私营部门,并增加了民间社会行为者的参与。几个感兴趣的团体之间的合作以及对公共城市空间的集体改造,增加了这些空间对多个用户和行为者的可达性,并为替代性和多样化的用途和活动提供了可能性。这可能强调了这样一个假设:未来的城市将以不那么正式的方式进行治理,并且城市形态将通过自发的、临时的、移动的和适应性的谈判过程来创建。
In the context of urban densification and central urban areas’ lack of open spaces, new forms of small-scale urban gardening practices have emerged. These gardening practices respond to urban pressures and open new modes of green space governance, presenting alternative and multifunctional ways to manage and revitalise cities. Focusing on the case of Geneva, the article unfolds two levels of discussion. On the one hand—and with reference to the theorist Habermas—it examines how multiple actors with different interests interplay and cooperate with each other in order to negotiate over open space, while discussing implications for local politics and planning. On the other hand, it describes how these negotiations result in new, innovative, and hybrid forms of public green space. The main findings indicate emerging forms of collaboration, partnerships, and governance patterns that involve public and private sectors and increase participation by civil society actors. Cooperation amongst several interested groups and the collective re-invention of public urban spaces increase these spaces’ accessibility for multiple users and actors, as well as present possibilities for alternative and diversified uses and activities. This might underline the hypothesis that future cities will be governed in less formalised ways, and that urban forms will be created through spontaneous, temporary, mobile, and adaptive negotiation processes.