Innovation for a steady state: a case for responsible stagnation
Innovation for a steady state: a case for responsible stagnation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/03085147.2016.1143727
复制
发表时间：
2016-02-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Medvecky, Fabien
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
de Saille, Stevienna;Medvecky, Fabien
负责任创新（RI）的支持者在开始讨论时经常保证，虽然他们反对不负责任的创新，但他们并不提倡不负责任的停滞。在通常用来说明这种创新模式的二乘二矩阵中，迄今为止，负责任的停滞象限基本上没有被提及，更不用说探索了。本文借鉴了现有的现实世界的情况下，研究从生态经济学的论点可能有助于RI的讨论。它质疑目前的增长驱动范式，并询问打开负责任的停滞的黑匣子是否也可能打开一扇理性讨论的大门，讨论过度生产或风险过高的部门和技术的资源消耗和发展速度，作为负责任创新的内在组成部分，而不是相反。
The proponents of responsible innovation (RI) have often opened their discussions with the reassurance that while they are against irresponsible innovation, they are not advocating irresponsible stagnation. In the two-by-two matrix generally used to illustrate this model of innovation, the quadrant for responsible stagnation has so far gone largely unmentioned, let alone explored. This paper draws on existing real-world cases to examine what arguments drawn from ecological economics might contribute to the discussion of RI. It questions the present growth-driven paradigm and asks whether opening the black box of responsible stagnation' might also open the door for a reasoned discussion about resource consumption and pace of development in over-productive or too-risky sectors and technologies, as an intrinsic part of responsible innovation, rather than its opposite.