Engendering Global Democracy
Engendering Global Democracy
复制标题
实现全球民主
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Eschle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Eschle
关注妇女边缘化的女权主义理论家和审视全球化影响的全球理论家都暴露了霸权自由民主思想和制度的不足。这些理论家开发了两套不同的重建策略，直到最近，它们仍然对彼此一无所知。此外，女权主义和全球民主计划在权力、政治、代理和变革的理论化方面都受到问题的困扰。最近女权主义关于公民身份和治理的争论在某种程度上汇集了对性别不平等和全球化的担忧，但它们仍然集中在国家和国家体系作为民主代表和参与的工具上。本文认为，更激进的重建策略可以从关于女权主义本身民主化的辩论中得出。本文借鉴黑人和第三世界女权主义者对白人主导的女权运动中种族主义的反应，并考察了她们对跨国组织努力的影响，指出了思考权力、政治、代理和变革的创新方式。这些共同构成了一个民主框架，其适用性超出了女权主义组织的范围，并且可以应对性别和全球化的边缘化。
The inadequacies of hegemonic liberal democratic ideas and institutions have been exposed by feminist theorists focusing on the marginalisation of women and by global theorists examining the impact of globalisation. These theorists have developed two distinct sets of reconstructive strategies that, until very recently, have remained in ignorance of each other. Further, both feminist and global democratic schemes have been dogged by problems in terms of their theorisation of power, politics, agency and change. Recent feminist arguments about citizenship and governance go some way to bringing together concerns about gender inequality and globalisation, but they remain centred on states and the states-system as vehicles for democratic representation and participation. This article argues that a more radical reconstructive strategy can be derived from debates about the democratisation of feminism itself. Drawing on the responses of black and third world feminists to racism in the white-dominated feminist movement, and examining their influence on efforts to organise transnationally, the article points to innovative ways of thinking about power, politics, agency and change. Together these amount to a democratic framework which has applicability beyond feminist organising and which confronts the marginalisations of both gender and globalisation.