Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview
Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01408.x
复制
发表时间：
2005-10-01
影响因子：
11.9
通讯作者：
Kamijima, K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Otsubo, T;Tanaka, K;Kamijima, K
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview（MINI）是一种简短的结构化诊断访谈，用于诊断16个轴I（诊断和统计手册）DSM-IV障碍和一种人格障碍。它的原始版本是由希恩和Lecrubier开发的。我们将MINI翻译成日文，并对日文版MINI的信度和效度进行了研究。82名受试者参加了MINI与DSM-III-R（SCID-P）结构化临床访谈的验证。169名受试者参与了MINI与专家专业意见的验证。77名受试者接受了两名研究者的访谈，随后在1-2天后由第三名访谈者再次进行访谈，第三名访谈者对初始评估结果不知情。一般来说，Kappa值表明MINI和SCID-P诊断之间的一致性良好或极好。Kappa值表明MINI和专家的诊断之间的协议，为大多数诊断。评价者间和重测信度为良好或优秀。平均持续时间的采访是18.8分钟，MINI和45.4分钟的SCID-P的相应部分。总体而言，结果表明，MINI日文版成功地可靠和有效地引起症状的标准，用于DSM-III-R诊断，并可以在不到一半的时间进行所需的SCID-P。
The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) is a short, structured diagnostic interview used as a tool to diagnose 16 axis I (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) DSM-IV disorders and one personality disorder. Its original version was developed by Sheehan and Lecrubier. We translated the MINI into Japanese, and investigated the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of MINI. Eighty-two subjects participated in the validation of the MINI versus the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-P). One hundred and sixty-nine subjects participated in the validation of the MINI versus an expert's professional opinion. Seventy-seven subjects were interviewed by two investigators and subsequently readministered by a third interviewer blind to the results of initial evaluation 1-2 days later. In general, kappa values indicated good or excellent agreement between MINI and SCID-P diagnoses. Kappa values indicated poor agreement between MINI and expert's diagnoses for most diagnoses. Interrater and test-retest reliabilities were good or excellent. The mean durations of the interview were 18.8 min for MINI and 45.4 min for corresponding sections of SCID-P. Overall, the results suggest that the MINI Japanese version succeeds in reliably and validly eliciting symptom criteria used in making DSM-III-R diagnoses, and can be performed in less than half the time required for the SCID-P.