Bridging the gap: voices from industry and research on industrial relevance of SPLC
Bridging the gap: voices from industry and research on industrial relevance of SPLC
复制标题
弥合差距：来自行业的声音和 SPLC 行业相关性的研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Danny Weyns
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Klaus Schmid;Rick Rabiser;Martin Becker;Goetz Botterweck;M. Galster;Iris Groher;Danny Weyns
产品线工程源于学术界，行业研究和软件工程实践中应用研究的富有成果的相互作用。 SPLC的创建是交换有关这个新兴话题并整合社区的主要场所。但是，今天，SPLC主要被视为一个学术会议，几乎没有行业参与。由于经常看到学术界和工业的强烈融合，因此我们在这里试图更好地了解从业者参观SPLC等学术会议的动机以及这种影响对此类会议的影响。该分析基于对从业人员和研究人员的九次系统访谈，他们长期以来一直是SPLC社区和其他领先的软件工程社区的成员。我们的初步结果阐明了从业人员和研究人员在参加SPLC等科学软件工程会议时交换知识和学习的相关性和兴趣。然而，结果还突出了行业和学术会议参与者的目标之间的差异，这通常会导致效率低下，甚至导致在SPLC等科学会议上进行建设性互动的障碍。从受访者和作者的角度来看，我们都将其作为指出进一步讨论点的基础。
Product line engineering emerged from a fruitful interaction of applied research in academia, industry research, and software engineering practice. SPLC was created as the primary venue to exchange ideas on this emerging topic and integrate the communities. Yet, today, SPLC is mostly regarded as an academic conference with little industry participation. Since a strong integration of academia and industry is often seen positive, here, we try to better understand motivations for practitioners to visit academic conferences like SPLC and the impact this has on such conferences. This analysis is based on nine systematic interviews with practitioners and researchers, who have been members of the SPLC community and other leading software engineering communities for a long time. Our preliminary results clarify the relevance and interest of practitioners and researchers to exchange knowledge and learn when attending scientific software engineering conferences such as SPLC. Yet, the results also highlight the differences between the goals of industry and academic conference participants, which often lead to inefficiencies and even barriers for constructive interaction at scientific conferences such as SPLC. We use this as a basis for pointing out further discussion points, both from the perspective of the interviewees as well as the authors.