Reading bedtime stories to compatriots: Reconciling global equality of opportunity and self-determination RIS volume 45 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

Reading bedtime stories to compatriots: Reconciling global equality of opportunity and self-determination RIS volume 45 issue 3 Cover and Front matter
复制标题

DOI:
10.1017/s0260210518000542
复制
发表时间:
2019-07-01
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Kollar, Eszter
Kollar, Eszter
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Banai, Ayelet;Kollar, Eszter

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个全球机会平等和自决,在当代全球正义理论的两个中心和似乎相互冲突的原则之间的和解。我们的和解概念借鉴了家庭-人的类比,遵循哈里·布里格豪斯(Harry Brighouse)和亚当·斯威夫特(Adam Swift)对家庭关系商品的描述,即允许父母之间的平等和家庭机会的平等。我们认为,首先,全球机会平等的一个合理的概念必须能够区分道德任意方面的国籍,需要从道德上允许的缓解。第二,我们认为,一个合理的标准区分整合了一个人的规范性利益在一生中:(一)一个孩子出生的社会环境,影响她的生活前景的利益;(二)集体自决的成年公民的利益。第三,我们概述了一个帐户的“人民关系的商品”,作为一个原则性的方式来限制允许范围的自决。公平的全球机会平等要求减轻因国籍而产生的不平等,但属于集体自决允许范围的不平等除外。
In this article, we propose a reconciliation between global equality of opportunity and self-determination, two central and seemingly conflicting principles in the contemporary theory of global justice. Our conception of reconciliation draws on the family-people analogy, following the account of familial relationship goods, developed by Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift, on permissible parental partiality and domestic equality of opportunity. We argue, first, that a plausible conception of global equality of opportunity must be able to distinguish morally arbitrary aspects of nationality that require mitigation from morally permissible ones. Second, we argue that a plausible criterion for the distinction integrates a person's normative interests over a lifetime: (i) the interests of a child born into societal circumstances that impact her life prospects; and (ii) the interests of an adult citizen in collective self-determination. Third, we outline an account of 'people relationship goods', as a principled way to circumscribe the permissible scope of self-determination. Fair global equality of opportunity requires mitigating nationality-tracking inequalities, except those that fall within the permissible scope of collective selfdetermination.