Response styles in the assessment of anger expression

Response styles in the assessment of anger expression
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.56
复制
发表时间:
2005-03-01
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Jürgensen, R
Jürgensen, R
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gollwitzer, M;Eid, M;Jürgensen, R

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究展示了如何混合分布项目反应模型可以用来检测不同的反应风格的临床评估愤怒的表达。在4,497例患者的临床样本中,对状态-特质愤怒表达量表的3个分量表进行分析,发现在2类和3类解决方案中表现出不同的反应风格。这些解决方案在子样本中具有稳健性。反应风格反映了心理上有意义的偏见(即,社会期望)和无意义的反应类别偏好。计算用于校正类成员关系(从而校正响应样式)的Person参数,并将其与原始分数进行比较。这些结果对临床评估研究的影响进行了讨论。
This study demonstrates how mixture distribution item response models can be used to detect different response styles in the clinical assessment of anger expression. Analyses of 3 subscales of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory in a clinical sample of 4,497 patients revealed that there are different response styles that manifest themselves in 2- and 3-class solutions. These solutions are robust across subsamples. Response styles reflect both psychologically meaningful biases (i.e., social desirability) and nonmeaningful response category preferences. Person parameters that correct for class membership (and thus, for response styles) are computed and compared with raw scores. The implications of these results for research on clinical assessment are discussed.