Do caries explorers transmit infections with persons? An evaluation of second molar caries onsets.
Do caries explorers transmit infections with persons? An evaluation of second molar caries onsets.
复制标题
龋齿探索者会传染人吗？
DOI：
10.1159/000262115
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Davis,S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hujoel,PP;Mäkinen,KK;Bennett,CB;Isokangas,PJ;Isotupa,KP;PapeJr,HR;Lamont,RJ;DeRouen,TA;Davis,S
Dental caries explorers may become contaminated during routine caries examinations with pathogenic organisms and thereby potentially transmit infections from one tooth to another within a patient. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the contamination status of explorers influenced the caries risk of second molars. Two explorer contamination statuses were defined: (1) contamination status 1 – explorers which had probed a carious molar just prior to examining the second molar versus explorers which had probed a sound molar prior to examining the second molar, and (2) contamination status 2 – sterile explorers versus explorers which had probed several teeth. Caries examinations were performed by 4 dentists on a cohort of 4th grade students in Belize City. The examination dates and sample sizes (n) were: September-October 1989 (n = 1,277), January 1991 (n = 1,111), and January 1992 (n = 961), and January-February 1993 (n = 861). Within this cohort, there were 221 subjects who (1) had at least one pit and fissure carious onset on a caries-free second molar, (2) had no evidence of dental treatments, and (3) were examined by the same examiner during the entire study. After adjusting for confounding variables, the examination of a second molar with a dental caries explorer in either contamination status 1 or 2 had no substantial effect on the caries risk (rate ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–1.18, and rate ratio 1.18,95% confidence interval: 0.89–1.56, respectively). If a true rate ratio of 1.7 or greater was associated with the contamination status 1 and 2, these analyses had more than 99 and 80% probability of detecting it, respectively. Conclusions: Examining a sound second molar with a contaminated dental explorer either does not affect the caries risk, or results in such a small increase in caries risk that it can only be reliably identified in studies where the exposure of sound teeth to contaminated dental explorers is randomized.
