Money and Marriage : The Practice of Dowry and Brideprice in Rural India
Money and Marriage : The Practice of Dowry and Brideprice in Rural India
复制标题
金钱与婚姻:印度农村嫁妆和彩礼的实践
DOI:
10.1086/685712
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
A. R. Chowdhury
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. R. Chowdhury
One important aspect characterizing marriages in India is the financial transfer made at the time of marriage between families involved. These transfers can go in both directions – from the bride’s family to the groom’s, known as dowry, and vice versa, known as brideprice. While previous research has focused on dowry and brideprice separately, the possibility of a joint determination has been ignored. In this paper, I analyze dowry and brideprice as interdependent institutions, using retrospective data from the Rural Economic and Demographic Survey 1998, a nationally representative survey of rural India. I use logistic, ordinary least square and seemingly unrelated regression models to provide a complete picture of the prevalence, diffusion and inflation of dowry and brideprice in India from 1975 to 1999, while determining the factors affecting the size of economic exchanges between families. The key finding is that the practice of dowry has expanded over time at both the country and the regional levels. However, contrary to popular belief and some research findings, the real value of dowry and brideprice has declined over time. Education and age of bride and groom, groom’s parental landholding, distance of marriage migration and the ratio of female to male at marriageable age are, in general, the important factors affecting the size of dowry. One very interesting finding is the positive association between bride’s education and dowry when the opposite is expected. The explanation is that for an educated bride, dowry is paid more as a bequest than as a price to attract better grooms. Findings in this paper expand our knowledge of the dynamics and key determinants of marriage transactions in India, contributing to the broader agenda of improving our understanding of an important social institution that is too often responsible for violating basic human rights. * I thank Dennis P Hogan, David P Lindstrom, Nancy Luke and Ali E Protik for helpful suggestions and discussions. Special thanks to Andrew D Foster for providing the data. However, I am responsible for any remaining errors.