The non-association values and meaningfulness of 1892 Japanese two-letter syllables and words
The non-association values and meaningfulness of 1892 Japanese two-letter syllables and words
复制标题
1892年日语二字母音节和单词的非联想值和意义
DOI：
10.4992/jjpsy.26.148
复制
发表时间：
1955
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Masao Ibuki
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Umemoto;Yasuo Morikawa;Masao Ibuki
日语无意义音节表早在1950年就已经由Uemoto标准化了(1)。但Uemoto的表的关联值一般太低，很难记住从表中取出的列表。因此，我们重新测量了所有可能的日语双字母纯音音节的联想价值和意义。由于我们的新表包含许多有意义的单词，我们认为将索引表示为100-关联值会更方便，我们称之为非关联值。此外，我们还计算了每个音节的关联词的数量，我们称之为音节的意义指数。这一指标与Noble(2)相同。调查对象为京都市区975名高中男女学生。联想任务所允许的时间为每个音节10秒。1892个音节被分成40个子表。将同一对照表发给所有SS组进行同质性检验，并根据结果进行换算，以检验这些表的有效性，并进行实验。材料是三个列表，每组七对，字母大写在刺激一侧，我们表格中的音节在反应一侧。反应音节的非关联值分别为0-4、25-29和50-54。学生为大学生。曝光时间为两秒。采用预期法。结果显示，如图3和表5所示，非关联值越高，达到标准所需的试验就越多。
A table of Japanese nonsense syllables was already standardized by Umemoto in 1950 (1). But association values of Umemoto's table are generally too low, and it is very difficult to memorize a list taken from the table. So we measured anew the association value and meaningfulness of all possible Japanese two-letter pure-sound syllables. As our new tables contain many meaningful words, we thought it would be more convenient to express the index as 100-association value, and we called it non-association value. Furthermore the number of associated words per syllable were computed, and we called this the index of meaningfulness of the syllables. This index is the same as that of Noble (2).Subjects were 975 boys and girls of high schools in Kyoto city. The time allowed for association task was ten seconds per syllable. 1892 syllables were divided into 40 subtables. One and same control list was given to all groups of Ss for testing the homogeneity of groups, and according to the results some conversions were made.To test the validity of these tables, and experiment was conducted. Materials were three lists of seven pairs each, with alphabet capitals on the stimulus side and the syllables from our tables on the response side. The non-association values of response syllables were 0-4, 25-29 and 50-54. Ss were university students. Exposure time was two seconds. Anticipation method was used. Results showed as in Fig. 3 and Table 5, that the higher the non-association values, the more trials were needed to reach the criterion.