Mediation in cognitive socialization: The influence of socioeconomic status

Mediation in cognitive socialization: The influence of socioeconomic status
复制标题

认知社会化的中介:社会经济地位的影响

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Suzanne M. Miller
Suzanne M. Miller
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Portes;J. Vadeboncoeur;A. Kozulin;Boris Gindis;V. Ageyev;Suzanne M. Miller

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

社会活动和成人与儿童的互动构成了认知社会化的基础。社会经济地位(SES)在多大程度上影响日常活动,以及他们在多大程度上被不同地雇用,当社会和学术能力的不同结果联系在一起时,就成为一个有争议的话题。社会化导致态度、价值观以及儿童在成长过程中使用的认知和语言技能,并最终成为发展的手段或工具。儿童通过各种形式的成人-儿童和其他社会互动发展能力。对于社会化来说,被视为重要和有价值的东西往往因社区而异。只有一些关于成人与儿童互动的文献涉及SES差异化活动设置的元素-例如,家庭结构,脚本,价值观和任务要求-这些都是历史上嵌入的。本章着重从文化历史的角度分析社会经济地位与成人与儿童互动的关系,虽然本章的范围限制了对这些主题的探讨,但本章还是在文化历史活动理论(CHAT)提供的框架内对一个研究样本进行了分析,并沿着了从CHAT视角进行成人与儿童互动研究的例子。CHAT的特点是对人类行为的发展和社会分析,通常由不同的文化工具介导。为了理解个体发展的差异,必须考虑不同活动环境中个体发展的差异,以及一个人在共同价值观、期望和实践方面的反应方式。
Social activities and adult–child interactions form the basis for cognitive socialization. The extent to which everyday activities differ by socioeconomic status (SES), and the extent to which they are employed differently, becomes a contentious topic when different outcomes in social and academic competence are linked. Socialization results in attitudes, values, and cognitive and linguistic skills that children use as they grow and ultimately become means or tools for development. Children develop competencies through various patterns of adult–child and other social interactions. Often what is seen as important and valuable for socialization varies across communities. Only some of the literature on adult–child interaction addresses elements of SES differentiated activity settings – for example, family structures, scripts, values, and task demands – that are historically embedded. This chapter focuses on a cultural–historical analysis of research linking SES to variations in adult–child interaction.Although the scope of the chapter limits the extent to which these topics may be explored, a sample of research is examined and framed within the structure provided by Cultural–Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), along with examples of adult–child interaction research approached from a CHAT perspective. CHAT is characterized by a developmental and social analysis of human action that is mediated generally by different cultural tools. To understand differences in individual development, variations in the latter must be considered across activity settings, as well as the way a person responds in terms of shared values, expectations, and practices.