From Subjectivity to Objective Evaluation: A Techno-rationalist Approach of Assessment Design for Art and Design Education

From Subjectivity to Objective Evaluation: A Techno-rationalist Approach of Assessment Design for Art and Design Education
复制标题

从主观评价到客观评价:艺术设计教育评价设计的技术理性主义方法

DOI:
10.1007/978-981-287-332-3_44
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lin Chou Cheng
Lin Chou Cheng
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lin Chou Cheng

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在艺术和设计领域,市场上的艺术品评估师使用主观评估来确定艺术品的质量是公认的规范。从本质上来说,这种主观的判断实践方式也被某种形式化并带入了艺术教育之中。在艺术背景下使用主观评估被认为在从业者中具有更好的有效性,因为艺术作品具有独特的情感背景,无法以固定的方式进行评估。然而,从院校排名的目的来看,主观评价的使用存在可靠性问题,因为它不能客观地将学生的表现与常态和商品区分开来。尽管艺术通常是主观评价的,但本文想分享的是,通过采用以技术理性为中心的标准评分方案,可以对艺术作品进行客观评价。
In the field of art and design, it is an accepted norm for the marketplace’s art appraisers to use subjective assessment in determining the quality of an artwork. Inherently, such subjective mode of judgmental practice is also somewhat formalized and being brought into the art education. The use of subjective assessment in the context of art is touted to have better validity among the practitioners, as the work of art has a unique emotional context that cannot be assessed in a fixated manner. However, from the perspective of institutional ranking purposes, the use of subjective assessment is posed to have a reliability issue, for it cannot objectively differentiate students’ performance from the norms and the goods. In spite of the fact that art is customarily to be appraised subjectively, this paper would like to share that the work of art can be evaluated objectively, through the adoption of criteria-marking scheme that is techno-rational centric.