Policy Instruments in the Common Agricultural Policy
Policy Instruments in the Common Agricultural Policy
复制标题
共同农业政策中的政策工具
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
W. Grant
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Grant
共同农业政策（CAP）的政策变化可以用政策工具的枯竭和长期矛盾来解释。政策手段的变化调整了政策方向，但没有改变《条约》的正式目标。这些工具在循证政策分析方面的社会和经济效力是决定其是否合法的一个关键因素。最初的政策工具一般都不起作用，但根据多功能模式重新制定政策，可以制定更有效的工具。在主导话语的影响下，工具和政策之间发生了动态互动。
Policy changes in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) can be explained in terms of the exhaustion and long-term contradictions of policy instruments. Changes in policy instruments have reoriented the policy without any change in formal Treaty goals. The social and economic efficacy of instruments in terms of evidence-based policy analysis was a key factor in whether they were delegitimised. The original policy instruments were generally dysfunctional, but reframing the policy in terms of a multifunctionality paradigm permitted the development of more efficacious instruments. A dynamic interaction takes place between the instruments and policy informed by the predominant discourses.