Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection
Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.gie.2008.01.037
复制
发表时间：
2008-07-01
影响因子：
7.7
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
美国胃肠内窥镜学会（ASGE）技术委员会提供了对胃肠道内窥镜检查实践有影响的现有的、新的或新兴的内窥镜技术的综述。使用循证方法，通过MEDLINE文献检索来确定与该主题相关的临床研究，通过MAUDE（食品和药物管理局设备和放射健康中心）数据库检索来确定给定技术的报告并发症。这两种方法都通过访问PubMed的“相关文章”功能和仔细检查已确定研究引用的相关参考文献来补充。强调临床对照试验，但在许多情况下缺乏随机对照试验的数据。在这种情况下，使用大型病例系列、初步临床研究和专家意见。技术数据收集自传统和基于网络的出版物、专有出版物以及与相关供应商的非正式通信。本综述使用“内镜下病变切除”、“内镜下粘膜切除”、“EMR”、“内镜下粘膜剥离”和“ESD”等关键词检索MEDLINE数据库，检索时间截止到2007年9月。“技术状态评估报告由ASGE技术委员会的1或2名成员起草，由委员会整体审查和编辑，并由ASGE理事会批准。当有财务指导时，提供最新的编码数据和出版时的目录价格。技术状态评估报告是仅为教育和信息目的而提供的科学评论。”技术状况评估报告不是规则，也不应被解释为建立一种法律上的护理标准，或鼓励、提倡、要求或不鼓励任何特定的治疗或支付这种治疗的费用。
The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methods are used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases data from randomized controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. For this review the MEDLINE database was searched through September 2007 by using the key words "endoscopic lesion removal," "endoscopic mucosal resection, " "EMR," "endoscopic submucosal dissection," and "ESD."Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of The ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by The committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.