Reverse versus forward order reporting and the accuracy of fourth-graders recalls of school breakfast and school lunch
Reverse versus forward order reporting and the accuracy of fourth-graders recalls of school breakfast and school lunch
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00030-0
复制
发表时间：
2003-05-01
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Shaffer, NM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baxter, SD;Thompson, WO;Shaffer, NM
背景。当提示以倒序或正序报告膳食和零食时，儿童在 24 小时回忆期间是否能更准确地回忆学校早餐和学校午餐的摄入量？方法。根据种族（黑人、白人）和性别对 121 名四年级学生进行了两次观察和访谈（每个订单一次），了解前一天的摄入量。遗漏率和侵入率决定了报告项目的准确性。完全不准确决定了报告项目和金额的准确性。结果。结果未能表明采访者、工作日、顺序（第一次或第二次回忆）或种族对遗漏率、侵入率或总体不准确率的显着影响。发现性别交互作用对于遗漏率存在显着的顺序，男性的反向回忆（53%）与正向回忆（62%）相比较低（即更好），但女性则不然（61% vs 53%）（P < 0.008）。男性的入侵率是可以接受的，反向回忆为 54%，正向回忆为 40%（P = 0.095）。反向回忆的遗漏率、侵入率和总不准确率的平均值分别为 57% 和 32%、6.4 份，前向回忆的平均值分别为 56% 和 39%、6.9 份。结论。与正向顺序相比，促使儿童以逆向顺序报告可以提高男性的漏报率和闯入率，而男性的漏报率和闯入率则高于女性。无论倒序还是正序，儿童报告有 30% 的报告项目没有被观察到。需要进行研究来提高儿童饮食回忆的准确性。 (C) 2003 年美国健康基金会和爱思唯尔科学（美国）。版权所有。
Background. Do children recall school breakfast and school lunch intake during 24-h recalls more accurately when prompted to report meals and snacks in reverse versus forward order?Methods. One hundred twenty-one fourth-graders stratified by race (Black, White) and gender were each observed and interviewed twice (once per order) regarding the previous day's intake. Omission and intrusion rates determined accuracy for reporting items. Total inaccuracy determined accuracy for reporting items and amounts.Results. Results failed to indicate significant effects of interviewer, weekday, sequence (first or second recall), or race on omission rates, intrusion rates, or total inaccuracy. A significant order by gender interaction was found for omission rates, which were lower (i.e., better) for males for reverse (53%) versus forward recalls (62%), but not females (61 versus 53%) (P < 0.008). Intrusion rates were acceptable for males for 54% of reverse recalls and 40% of forward recalls (P = 0.095). Means were 57 and 32%, and 6.4 servings for omission rate, intrusion rate, and total inaccuracy for reverse recalls, and 56 and 39%, and 6.9 servings for forward recalls.Conclusions. Prompting children to report in reverse versus forward order improved omission and intrusion rates for males more so than females. Regardless of reverse or forward order, children reported 30% of items reported were not observed. Research is needed to enhance accuracy of children's dietary recalls. (C) 2003 American Health Foundation and Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.