Planning the post-metropolis
Planning the post-metropolis
复制标题
规划后都市
DOI：
10.1080/02513625.2012.702953
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Balducci
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Balducci
约翰·弗里德曼在21世纪初介绍他的著作《城市的前景》时写道：“城市已死。它在世纪的某个时候消失了。”他建议将新出现的人类住区形式简单地称为“城市”。事实上，面对过去30年来城市化进程的加速，我们一直在不懈地寻找能够表达城市所发生的事情的新词：无止境的城市，扩散的城市，disurbia，外城，rurban，分散的城市化，城市区域，区域城市化，特大城市区域等。很明显，“城市”和“大都会”，其等级和二分法的含义，不再有助于理解社会的空间组织正在发生什么。
Introducing his book The Prospects of Cities at the beginning of the 2000s, John Friedmann wrote, “The city is dead. It vanished sometime during the 20th century.” He proposed calling the emerging forms of human habitat simply “the urban”. In fact, facing the acceleration of urbanization processes in the last 30 years, we have been looking relentlessly for new words capable of expressing what has been happening to cities: the endless city, the città diffusa, disurbia, outer city, rurban, dispersed urbanization, urban region, regional urbanization, mega-city-region, etc. What is clear is that the conceptual terms “city” and “metropolis”, with their hierarchical and dichotomous implications, are no longer useful for understanding what is happening to the spatial organization of society.