How Was School Today

How Was School Today
复制标题

今天在学校怎么样

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zoya Master
Zoya Master
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zoya Master

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

新年快乐!去年我描述了BPM研究中的几个运动,包括边界跨越[1]、绿色BPM [2]和x-aware BPM [3]。在我2012年的第一篇专栏文章中,我想转向“BPM研究和教育”的教育方面。业务流程管理教育旨在为组织提供成功的BPM计划所需的知识和能力。当我们看到组织如何变得更加面向过程和更加成熟时,我们也看到他们如何对BPM可以提供的计划和结果提出更高的要求。反过来,对BPM专业知识的需求也在增加。流程所有者、流程分析师、流程架构师和BPM卓越中心的经理只是其中一些需要深入和专业以及广泛和通用BPM技能的工作描述。可以观察到的另一个现象是,越来越多的组织对采用或扩展BPM计划和实施BPM技术感兴趣,但不一定有足够的内部能力来实施这些计划。因此,最基本的决定是“购买或建立”--通过咨询公司从外部雇用BPM专家,或者在组织内部建立BPM专家。当然,从长远来看,后一种选择更具可持续性,因为专业知识是在内部开发的。然而,障碍依然存在。我们尤其看到:(1)对组织中的“过程“概念缺乏一致和全面的理解;(2)缺乏BPM实践和技术方面的能力和知识。因此,一些组织求助于大学,以应对技能挑战。事实上,BPM在学术界取得了长足的进步[4]。信息系统、计算机科学、运营管理、商业和其他学科的学院正在引领BPM教学在学术界的传播。一些部门正在致力于教学和开发新的BPM课程,以增加商业专业的数量;而在其他部门,BPM被提议作为对雇主代表,专业协会和联邦政府要求将就业技能嵌入大学课程的回应。然而,在学术界或实践者中缺乏对BPM的共同愿景和定义,阻碍了可用于世界各地专业认证机构和大学教育的一致BPM知识体系的发展。因此,我想做的是...
Happy New Year! Last year I described several movements in BPM research, including efforts of boundary spanning [1], Green BPM [2] and x-aware BPM [3]. In my first Column in 2012, I want to turn to the educational side of " BPM Research and Education ". Education in Business Process Management is meant to provide organizations with the knowledge and capabilities that they require for successful BPM initiatives. As we are seeing how organizations are becoming more process-oriented and more mature, we also see how they become more demanding of the initiatives and the outcomes BPM can provide. In turn, the need for BPM expertise is increasing. Process owners, process analysts, process architects, and managers of BPM centers of excellence are just some of the job descriptions for which deep and specialized as well as broad and generic BPM skills are required. Another observation that can be made is that an increasing number of organizations are interested in adopting or expanding BPM initiatives and implementing BPM technologies without necessarily having sufficient internal competencies to undertake these initiatives. The essential decision is thus to " buy or build " – hiring BPM expertise from the outside through consultancies, or building BPM expertise within the organization. Of course, the latter option is more sustainable in the long run, as expertise is developed in-house. Still, roadblocks persist. We witness in particular: (1) a lack of consistent and comprehensive understanding of the notion of " process " in organizations and (2) a lack of capabilities and knowledge in BPM practices and technologies. Several organizations turn therefore to universities to provide a response to the skill challenge. And indeed, BPM is making strides in academia [4]. Faculties in Information Systems, Computer Science, Operations Management, Business and other disciplines are leading the diffusion of BPM teaching in academia. Some departments are committing to teaching and developing new courses on BPM in order to increase the number of business majors; while in others, BPM is proposed as an answer to calls from employer representatives, professional associations, and the federal government to embed employability skills in university curricula. Yet, the lack of a common vision and definition of BPM among academics or practitioners is hindering the development of a consistent BPM body of knowledge that can be used for education by both professional certification bodies and universities around the world. Thus, what I want to do in this …