USING KINTSCH COMPUTATIONAL MODEL TO IMPROVE INSTRUCTIONAL TEXT - EFFECTS OF REPAIRING INFERENCE CALLS ON RECALL AND COGNITIVE STRUCTURES
USING KINTSCH COMPUTATIONAL MODEL TO IMPROVE INSTRUCTIONAL TEXT - EFFECTS OF REPAIRING INFERENCE CALLS ON RECALL AND COGNITIVE STRUCTURES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.329
复制
发表时间：
1991-09-01
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
GULGOZ, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BRITTON, BK;GULGOZ, S
本研究的目的是将计算心理学模型与教学实践联系起来。W. Kintsch（Kintsch和TA货车Dijk，1978; JR米勒和Kintsch，1980）的阅读理解模型被用来确定在1,000字的临时文本中需要推理的位置。然后对每个位置进行修复，以产生原则性翻修。在一项实验中，170名大学生（N= 170），自由回忆的原则性修订大大增加了比原来的版本。此外，原文作者和7个主题专家提供了原文本的预期认知结构的形状的措施。作者和专家的认知结构形态与上述相关。5与形状提供的美国空军新兵谁读了原则性的修订，但只有。1与阅读原始版本的新兵一起。显然，原则性的修改比原文更好地贯彻了作者的意图。金奇模式可以用来改进教学文本。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
The goal of this study was to link a computational psychological model to instructional practice. W. Kintsch's (Kintsch and TA Van Dijk, 1978; JR Miller and Kintsch, 1980) reading comprehension model was used to identify locations where inferences were called for in a 1,000-word expository text. Then each location was repaired to produce a principled revision. In an experiment with 170 undergraduates (N= 170), free recall of the principled revision was much increased over that of the original version. Also, the author of the original text and 7 subject-matter experts provided measures of the shape of the original text's intended cognitive structure. The author's and experts' cognitive structure shapes correlated above. 5 with the shapes provided by US Air Force recruits who read the principled revision but only. 1 with recruits who read the original version. Apparently, the principled revision carried out the author's intentions better than the author's original text. It is concluded that Kintsch's model can be used to improve instructional text.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)