Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and ethics
Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and ethics
复制标题
相互冲突的理性：对规划理论和伦理的影响
DOI：
10.1080/1464935032000146318
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
V. Watson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Watson
文章认为，虽然某些最近的规划理论试图考虑到社会差异和多元文化，但还没有充分认识到差异有多深，以及规划师如何经常发现自己处于理性冲突的情况下。本文借鉴了一个案例，试图在南非的开普敦的非正式解决升级，说明差距的概念之间的差距“适当的公民”和“适当的生活环境”的市政府所支持的，和性质的合理性指导某些其他有关各方的行动。这种理解，它建议，有重要的意义，规划理论和伦理。
The article argues that while certain recent planning theories have attempted to take account of social difference and multiculturalism, there is not yet sufficient recognition of just how deep difference can be, and how planners can frequently find themselves in situations characterized by conflicting rationalities. The article draws on a case of an attempted informal settlement upgrade in Cape Town, South Africa, to illustrate the gap between the notion of ‘proper citizens’ and ‘proper living environments’ espoused by the municipality, and the nature of the rationality guiding the actions of certain of the other parties involved. This understanding, it is suggested, has important implications for both planning theory and ethics.