Who's Own the Public Space?: The Adaptation of Limited Space in Arabic Kampong☆
Who's Own the Public Space?: The Adaptation of Limited Space in Arabic Kampong☆
复制标题
谁拥有公共空间？：阿拉伯甘榜有限空间的改编☆
DOI：
10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.134
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K.D. Erli Martha
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Karina Pradinie;A. Navastara;K.D. Erli Martha
公共空间的私有化从90年代开始在美国就一直是一个问题，当时一些人意识到公共空间并不那么公共。尤尔根·哈贝马斯将公共空间定义为一个政体的公民可以自由进入并享有使用权的空间[1]，但另一方面，“公共”一词变得模糊不清。这一现象的发展已成为规划界的一种趋势。海登提出了“公共空间的驯化”[2]，另一个研究是安娜明顿对公共空间的私有化的研究，并且有很多研究认为公共空间（特别是半公共空间）大多有一个个人或社区，他们经常使用公共空间作为自己的空间。阿拉伯语的kampong是泗水文化kampong之一。公共空间私有化的模式，是对他们有限空间的一种适应。该地区没有大型或巨大的公共空间，这让他们别无选择，只能适应它。
The privatization of public space has been an issue since ‘90 in America, when some people realize that public space is not so public. Jürgen Habermas defines that public space is considered to be that space to which citizens of a polity have access and enjoy free right of use [1], but on the other hand the ‘term’ of public became ambiguous. The development of the phenomenon has been trend among the planner. Hayden bringing up the ‘domestication of public space’[2], the other research was Anna Minton with the privatization of public space and there are some many research that conclude the public space (especially in the semi – public space) mostly have a individual or communal who's use the public space regularly as its own it. The Arabic kampong is a one of the cultural kampong in Surabaya. The pattern of the privatization of the public space, been an adaptation for their limited space. The non- existences of the large or massive public space in the area leave them with no options except to adapt with it.