Vested interest and symbolic politics--observations and recommendations: reply To Sears (1997).
Vested interest and symbolic politics--observations and recommendations: reply To Sears (1997).
复制标题
既得利益和象征政治——观察和建议：回复西尔斯（1997）。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.72.3.497
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Crano,WD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Crano,WD
In his comment on the author's original article (WD Crano, see record 84-22517) on vested interest, symbolic politics, and attitude-behavior consistency, D. Sears (see record 84-22569) concentrated on 3 important features of the original study: the logic of the analytic design, the strength of effects and, more broadly, the possibility that the apparent discontinuity between survey and laboratory findings on self-interest and attitude may reside in respondent characteristics. In response, it is argued that (a) the analytic logic, although at variance with that used in survey studies of symbolic politics, is appropriate, logical, and in conformance with standard practice;(b) the predicted effects reported are both statistically and practically significant;(c) the discontinuity between laboratory and field research may be more apparent than real; but (d) a more intense integration of self-interest and symbolic politics—a suggestion made in the original article—is precisely what is needed.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)
