Explaining the number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding: a reply to Kuha and Sturgis
Explaining the number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding: a reply to Kuha and Sturgis
复制标题
解释干扰调查结果所需的反事实案例数量：对库哈和斯特吉斯的答复
DOI：
10.1080/13645579.2015.1126494
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Gorard S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gorard S
这篇简短的论文是我们原始论文的延伸，用什么来代替显著性检验？在Jouni Kuha和帕特里克Stugis做出回应后，计算“扰乱调查结果所需的反事实案例数量”。它显示了他们的反应如何帮助我们发展“需要干扰的数量”（NNTD）的想法，并允许我们进一步解释这个想法。NNTD允许研究人员在一个图中总结研究的规模、“效应”大小和损耗。
This brief paper is an extension of our original paper What to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the ‘number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding’, following a response by Jouni Kuha and Patrick Stugis. It shows how their response assists in the development of our idea of the ‘number needed to disturb’ (NNTD) a finding, and allows us to explain that idea further. NNTD allows researchers to summarise the scale, ‘effect’ size and attrition of a study in one figure.
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Sturgis, Patrick;Brunton-Smith, Ian;Jackson, Jonathan
通讯作者：
Jackson, Jonathan