REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: time for reconsideration
REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: time for reconsideration
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/14693062.2014.905822
复制
发表时间：
2014-11
期刊：
影响因子：
7.1
通讯作者：
P. Minang;M. van Noordwijk;L. Duguma;D. Alemagi;Trong Hoan Do;F. Bernard;P. Agung;V. Robiglio;D. Catacutan;S. Suyanto;Angel Daniel Armas;Claudia Silva Aguad;Mireille Feudjio;G. Galudra;R. Maryani;D. White;A. Widayati;E. Kahurani;S. Namirembe;B. Leimona
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Minang;M. van Noordwijk;L. Duguma;D. Alemagi;Trong Hoan Do;F. Bernard;P. Agung;V. Robiglio;D. Catacutan;S. Suyanto;Angel Daniel Armas;Claudia Silva Aguad;Mireille Feudjio;G. Galudra;R. Maryani;D. White;A. Widayati;E. Kahurani;S. Namirembe;B. Leimona
在《联合国气候变化框架公约》（《气候公约》）谈判之后，减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量的努力加上森林养护、可持续管理和增加碳储存（降排+）在发展中国家变得越来越重要。这有利于在国家一级投资于各国为REDD+做好准备的进程（称为REDD+准备进程）。然而，很少有人关注如何评估和潜在地改进准备程度。本文提出了一个准备评估框架，并比较了四个国家，即喀麦隆，印度尼西亚，秘鲁和越南在REDD+准备方面的进展。准备情况评估框架包括六项职能，即规划和协调;政策、法律和机构;衡量、报告、核实和审计;惠益分享;筹资;以及示范和试点。我们认为，该框架在衡量进展情况和深入了解国家一级的准备进程方面是可信和一致的。各国在各种职能方面的业绩好坏参半。在规划和协调以及示范和试点方面取得了明显进展。然而，衡量、报告和核实以及审计、筹资、惠益分享以及政策、法律和体制面临重大挑战。结果表明，国家森林治理的方式已形成的历史情况（显示路径依赖）是一个关键因素的准备进程取得进展。鉴于在解决毁林和森林退化的驱动因素、将降排+与更广泛的国家战略和系统性能力建设联系起来方面存在严重差距，有必要重新思考目前的降排+准备基础设施。
Efforts towards Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation plus conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of carbon stocks (REDD+) have grown in importance in developing countries following negotiations within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This has favoured investments in processes to prepare countries for REDD+ at the national level (a process referred to as REDD+ Readiness). Yet, little attention has been given to how Readiness can be assessed and potentially improved. This article presents a framework for Readiness assessment and compares progress in REDD+ Readiness across four countries, namely Cameroon, Indonesia, Peru, and Vietnam. The Readiness assessment framework comprises six functions, namely planning and coordination; policy, laws, and institutions; measurement, reporting, verification (MRV), and audits; benefit sharing; financing; and demonstrations and pilots. We found the framework credible and consistent in measuring progress and eliciting insight into Readiness processes at the country level. Country performance for various functions was mixed. Progress was evident on planning and coordination, and demonstration and pilots. However, MRV and audits; financing; benefit sharing; and policies, laws and institutions face major challenges. The results suggest that the way national forest governance has been shaped by historical circumstances (showing path dependency) is a critical factor for progress in Readiness processes. There is need for a rethink of the current REDD+ Readiness infrastructure given the serious gaps observed in addressing drivers of deforestation and forest degradation, linking REDD+ to broader national strategies and systematic capacity building.