Habitus, Hierarchien und Methoden: „Feine Unterschiede“ zwischen Physik und Chemie
Habitus, Hierarchien und Methoden: „Feine Unterschiede“ zwischen Physik und Chemie
复制标题
习惯、层次和方法：“Feine Unterschiede” zwischen Physik und Chemie
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Reinhardt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Reinhardt
研究方法及其开发人员在汇集科学领域方面发挥着至关重要的作用。希望自己的方法在另一个学科中得到认可和使用的科学家必须弥合不同实践和世界观之间的差距，他们在改变既定做法的同时，经常会经历敌意、怀疑以及普遍的“另类”感觉。科学领域的实践。代表材料科学等新兴领域的研究人员必须克服更多由威胁和恐惧感而不是基于认识或社会考虑的论点造成的障碍。在使用皮埃尔·布迪厄的惯习概念，我在这篇文章中分析的声明和观察的科学家谁在20世纪50年代和60年代已经引入了物理方法到化学，并在这样做合并的研究社区的特点到一个新的单位。物理学家、化学家和以方法为导向的研究人员的习惯是由学科内部和学科之间的等级关系塑造的。研究访谈和自我描述中的情感表达，可以进入到迄今为止被忽视的历史进程中，从而形成新的学科和领域。所提供的简短案例研究被视为范例，所提供的分析更多的是为了为进一步的研究提供一个可能的模型，而不是给出结论性的答案。
Research methods and their developers play a crucial role in bringing together scientific fields. Scientists, who wish to have their methods acknowledged and used in another discipline have to bridge the gaps between different practices and worldviews, and they often experience hostility, incredulity, and in general feelings of ‘otherness’, while changing the established practice in a scientific field. Researchers representing newly emerging fields such as materials science have to overcome obstacles that are caused more by feelings of threat and fear than by arguments rooted in epistemic or social considerations. In using the habitus concept of Pierre Bourdieu, I analyze in this article statements and observations of the scientists who in the 1950s and 1960s have introduced physical methods into chemistry and in so doing merged characteristic features of research communities into a new unit. The habitus of physicists, chemists and method-oriented researchers are shaped by hierarchical relationships inside the disciplines, and between them. Studying emotional expressions in interviews and self-descriptions gives access to hitherto neglected parts of the historical processes leading to new disciplines and fields. The brief case studies presented are seen as exemplars, and the analysis offered is intended more to provide a possible model for further research than as giving conclusive answers.