A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics
A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics
复制标题
一项旨在提高研究伦理的实验室嵌入式话语干预的随机试验
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
K. Esterling
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Plemmons;E. Baranski;K. Harp;David D Lo;C. Soderberg;Timothy M. Errington;Brian A. Nosek;K. Esterling
研究的伦理实践要求研究人员对其研究团队的其他成员以及外部受众给出其行为的理由和理由。我们开发了一个基于项目的培训课程，旨在使伦理话语成为大学科学和工程实验室的常规实践。在这里，我们报告了在两个研究密集型机构的科学和工程实验室中实施的随机对照试验的结果。我们证明，与对照实验室相比，在干预后4个月进行的调查中，治疗实验室成员感知到其实验室内研究伦理话语质量的改善，以及对该话语与他们工作的相关性和原因的认识的增强。我们报告了一项研究伦理培训干预的随机试验，该干预旨在加强大学科学和工程实验室的伦理沟通，特别关注作者身份和数据管理。干预是一个基于项目的研究伦理课程，旨在提高科学和工程研究实验室成员参与伦理实践所需的推理和人际沟通的能力。这项随机试验在美国两家研究密集型机构的活跃的教师领导的实验室中进行。在这里，我们表明，通过干预后4个月进行的一项调查，实验室成员感知到他们实验室内研究伦理话语质量的改善，并增强了对该话语与他们工作的相关性和原因的认识。与更典型的基于模块或课堂的道德指导相比，这种培训代表了一种范式转变，这种教学脱离了实验室的日常工作流程和实践，旨在培养实验室成员互动的工作环境中科学和工程研究的道德校园文化。
Significance The ethical practice of research requires researchers to give reasons and justifications for their actions, both to the other members of their research team as well as to external audiences. We developed a project-based training curriculum intended to make ethics discourse a routine practice in university science and engineering laboratories. Here, we report the results of a randomized control trial implemented among science and engineering laboratories in two research-intensive institutions. We demonstrate that, compared with the control laboratories, treatment laboratory members perceived improvements in the quality of discourse on research ethics within their laboratories as well as enhanced awareness of the relevance and reasons for that discourse for their work as measured in surveys administered 4 mo after the intervention. We report a randomized trial of a research ethics training intervention designed to enhance ethics communication in university science and engineering laboratories, focusing specifically on authorship and data management. The intervention is a project-based research ethics curriculum that was designed to enhance the ability of science and engineering research laboratory members to engage in reason giving and interpersonal communication necessary for ethical practice. The randomized trial was fielded in active faculty-led laboratories at two US research-intensive institutions. Here, we show that laboratory members perceived improvements in the quality of discourse on research ethics within their laboratories and enhanced awareness of the relevance and reasons for that discourse for their work as measured by a survey administered over 4 mo after the intervention. This training represents a paradigm shift compared with more typical module-based or classroom ethics instruction that is divorced from the everyday workflow and practices within laboratories and is designed to cultivate a campus culture of ethical science and engineering research in the very work settings where laboratory members interact.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Matz, DC;Wood, W
通讯作者：
Wood, W