Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012

Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/14616718.2013.840110
复制
发表时间:
2013-11
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Nicole Gurran;P. Phibbs
Nicole Gurran;P. Phibbs
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nicole Gurran;P. Phibbs

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文考察了澳大利亚住房供应作为城市政策和改革的一个关键考虑因素的出现。澳大利亚在过去十年中经历了住房负担能力下降,自全球金融危机以来住房建设缓慢。与许多其他国家一样,人们越来越重视土地利用规划作为主要的供应限制,这与澳大利亚公共部门正在进行的放松管制的新自由主义运动背景下关于规划和开发控制合法性的理论辩论产生了共鸣。本文通过对2003 - 2012年澳大利亚政府和行业话语的详细分析,发现将规划作为住房市场问题的主要原因的论点薄弱且自相矛盾,并严重反映了行业游说团体的观点。虽然不能免除规划作为一个潜在的供应方制约因素,但规划系统本身的持续变化造成了不确定性,并分散了可能用于促进中低收入群体住房供应和负担得起的住房的积极政策杠杆的范围。
This paper examines the emergence in Australia of housing supply as a key consideration in urban policy and reform. Australia has experienced declining housing affordability over the past decade, and sluggish housing construction since the GFC. As in many other nations, there has been a growing emphasis on land use planning as the major supply constraint, resonating with theoretical debates about the legitimacy of planning and development control in the context of an ongoing neo-liberal campaign for deregulation across the Australian public sector. Through a detailed analysis of Australian government and industry discourse between 2003 and 2012, this paper finds the arguments for planning as the chief cause of housing market problems weak and contradictory, and heavily reflect the views of industry lobby groups. While not absolving planning as a potential supply side constraint, ongoing change to the planning system itself creates uncertainty and distracts from the range of positive policy levers that might be used to promote housing supply and affordable homes for low- and moderate-income groups.