EVALUATION OF 3 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FETAL WEIGHT
EVALUATION OF 3 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FETAL WEIGHT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/jcu.1870140303
复制
发表时间：
1986-03-01
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
OBRIEN, PC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
HILL, LM;BRECKLE, R;OBRIEN, PC
在124例单胎妊娠中比较了三种超声估计胎儿体重的方法（坎贝尔、Warsof和谢泼德）。胎儿腹围是通过使用地图测量仪和直径测量和周长方程获得的。坎贝尔公式估计胎儿体重在2，000 ~ 4，000 g之间上级，而谢泼德公式估计胎儿体重在2，000 g以下和4，000 g以上稍好。因此，不同的胎儿人体测量特征使得每个机构在选择一种方法之前必须评估几种方法。使用坎贝尔和谢泼德的方法，使用直径测量和周长方程比使用地图测量器时更准确地估计胎儿体重。
Three ultrasonic methods for estimating fetal weight (Campbell, Warsof, and Shepard) were compared in 124 singleton pregnancies. Fetal abdominal circumference was obtained by use of a map measurer and from diameter measurements and the equation for the circumference of a circle. Campbell's formula for estimating fetal weight was superior between 2,000 and 4,000 g, whereas Shepard's method was slightly better below 2,000 g and over 4,000 g. Hence, varied fetal anthropometric characteristics make it mandatory that several methods be evaluated by each institution before one is selected. With the methods of Campbell and Shepard, use of diameter measurements and the equation for the circumference of a circle resulted in a more accurate estimated fetal weight than when a map measurer was used.