Are Persons Low in Self-Control Rational and Deterrable?
Are Persons Low in Self-Control Rational and Deterrable?
复制标题
自控力低下的人是否理性且令人畏惧？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Sanders
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
John K. Cochran;V. Aleksa;B. Sanders
这项工作解决了Wright等人（2004）提出的一个问题，即自我控制能力低的个体的理性和威慑力。有些人认为，所有的人都被认为是同样理性的;另一些人则认为，缺乏自我控制的人、冲动的人和以现在为导向的人不太可能受到惩罚的风险和成本的影响;根据第三组学者的说法，那些拥有这种自我控制/克制的人要么没有犯罪的动机，要么受到道德约束的抑制，因此，对制裁威胁无动于衷。这些竞争对手的预测检查使用的自我报告的调查数据，从本科大学生的样本学术不诚实。在大量的模型中，采用各种功能形式的影响，感知制裁威胁，我们一贯观察到，感知制裁威胁对大学生的自我报告的学术不诚实的影响并不因其犯罪倾向（自我控制）的水平而异。
This work addresses a question raised by Wright et al. (2004) pertaining to the rationality and deterrability of individuals with low self-control. According to some, all persons are presumed to be equally rational; according others, individuals who possess little self-control, who are impulsive and present-oriented are less likely to be influenced by a perceived risks and costs of punishment; and according to a third group of scholars, those who do possess such self-control/restraint are either not motivated toward offending or are inhibited by moral constraints and are, thus, unresponsive to sanction threats. These rival predictions are examined with the use of self-report survey data on academic dishonesty from a sample of undergraduate college students. Across a tremendous number of models employing a variety of functional forms for the effects of perceived sanction threats, we consistently observed that the effects of perceived sanction threats on college students' self-reported academic dishonesty did not vary by their level of offending propensity (self-control).