Pioneering Iranian Studies in Meiji Japan: Between Creating Modern Academism and Strategic Approach
Pioneering Iranian Studies in Meiji Japan: Between Creating Modern Academism and Strategic Approach
复制标题
日本明治时代的伊朗研究先驱：在创造现代学院派与战略方法之间
DOI：
10.1080/00210862.2017.1303328
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
0.3
通讯作者：
Kenji KURODA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
菊政俊平;國部雅大;國部雅大;Kokubu M;國部雅大;黒田賢治;Kenji KURODA
本文探讨了日本明治时期（1868 - 1912）的伊朗学术与西方学术中的东方主义的关系。许多研究者将伊朗研究的定义局限于20世纪30年代以来发表的专业著作，他们得出的结论是，日本的伊朗研究与东方主义之间存在着间接的关系。与此相反，本文在更广泛的意义上，指的是所有关于伊朗的学术研究。本文主要探讨明治时期日本对外关系中两个重要的原始学术领域：地理学和国际政治学。它的结论是，在明治时期的先驱伊朗研究学者并不完全免疫东方主义，但另一方面，他们对伊朗的研究是不那么密切地联系到帝国主义的西方学术，爱德华·赛义德著名的批评。
This article explores the relationship between academic studies concerning Iran in Meiji Japan (1868‒1912) and Orientalism in Western scholarship. Many researchers who have limited their definition of Iranian studies to the professional works published since the 1930s have concluded that there is an indirect relation between Iranian studies in Japan and Orientalism. In contrast, this paper takes it in a wider sense to mean all academic studies regarding Iran. The paper focuses on two such important proto-academic fields regarding foreign countries in Meiji Japan: geography and international politics. It concludes that the pioneering Iranian studies scholars in the Meiji period were not totally immune to Orientalism on the one hand but, on the other, that their research on Iran was less closely connected to imperialism than the Western scholarship that Edward Said famously critiqued.