GIS and the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Regional Landfill Site Selection in Transitional Countries: A Case Study From Serbia

GIS and the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Regional Landfill Site Selection in Transitional Countries: A Case Study From Serbia
复制标题

转型国家区域垃圾填埋场选址的 GIS 和层次分析法:塞尔维亚案例研究

DOI:
10.1007/s00267-011-9792-3
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
M. Vojinović Miloradov
M. Vojinović Miloradov
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tamara Zelenović Vasiljević;Z. Srdjevic;R. Bajčetić;M. Vojinović Miloradov

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

《2010-2019年塞尔维亚国家废物管理战略》与欧洲联盟指令相一致,对垃圾填埋场规定了新的非常严格的要求。为了能够分析填埋场选址所需的一些定性和定量因素,必须用新的方法取代传统的选址方法。选择GIS与层次分析法相结合的方法来解决这一复杂问题。塞尔维亚北方的Srem地区是环境最敏感的地区之一,被选为案例研究。被选为标准/子标准的17个因素被认为是最重要的,分为地质自然,环境,社会和技术经济因素,并进行了评估,来自不同领域的专家使用层次分析法在弧GIS的扩展。将加权后的空间图层组合成垃圾填埋适宜性图,再与4个限制图叠加,得到最终的适宜性图。根据结果,82.65%的Srem领土不适合区域填埋场选址。最适宜区占9.14%,适宜区占5.24%,低适宜区和极低适宜区分别占2.21%和0.76%。根据这些调查结果,建议将靠近两个大城市群的五个地点作为Srem区域填埋场的可能地点。然而,最终决定将需要进一步的实地调查,公众验收调查,并考虑土地的所有权状况和价格。
The Serbian National Waste Management Strategy for the Period 2010–2019, harmonized with the European Union Directives, mandates new and very strict requirements for landfill sites. To enable analysis of a number of required qualitative and quantitative factors for landfill site selection, the traditional method of site selection must be replaced with a new approach. The combination of GIS and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was selected to solve this complex problem. The Srem region in northern Serbia, being one of the most environmentally sensitive areas, was chosen as a case study. Seventeen factors selected as criteria/sub-criteria were recognized as most important, divided into geo-natural, environmental, social and techno-economic factors, and were evaluated by experts from different fields using an AHP extension in Arc GIS. Weighted spatial layers were combined into a landfill suitability map which was then overlapped with four restriction maps, resulting in afinal suitability map. According to the results, 82.65% of the territory of Srem is unsuitable for regional landfill siting. The most suitable areas cover 9.14%, suitable areas 5.24%, while areas with low and very low suitability cover 2.21 and 0.76% of the territory, respectively. Based on these findings, five sites close to two large urban agglomerations were suggested as possible locations for a regional landfill site in Srem. However, the final decision will require further field investigation, a public acceptance survey, and consideration of ownership status and price of the land.