Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070597
复制
发表时间：
2023-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Downs, Johnny
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Morris, Anna Charlotte;Telesia, Laurence;Wickersham, Alice;Epstein, Sophie;Matcham, Faith;Sonuga-Barke, Edmund;Downs, Johnny
体动仪通常用于记录正常和发育中儿童的自由生活体力活动。虽然腕动计的准确性和可靠性已经被广泛探讨，但关于年轻人对这些设备的看法的研究却很少。本综述旨在识别和综合与5-11岁儿童可接受腕动记录仪相关的证据。从2018年1月至2023年2月，将通过奥维德界面对Embase、MEDLINE、PsychInfo和社会政策与实践进行数据库检索;通过EBSCO界面对教育资源信息中心（ERIC）、英国教育索引和CINAHL进行数据库检索。将进行补充的前向和后向引用以及灰色文献数据库检索，包括医疗保健管理信息联盟（HMIC）和PsycEXTRA。定性和定量研究，不包括综述文章和荟萃分析，将有资格，没有日期限制。文章筛选和数据提取将由两名综述作者进行，不一致意见将提交给第三名综述作者。主要结局（活动记录可接受性）将来自纳入的定性文献和定量文献中确定的可接受性相关汇总描述性统计中确定的主要主题的叙述性综合。亚组分析将确定可接受性是否随关键参与者和活动记录仪因素而变化。本系统性综述不需要伦理批准，因为它使用的数据来自先前发表的文献。研究结果将以手稿形式呈现，并发表在同行评审期刊上，并将与单独的协同设计研究流一起考虑，以告知新型儿童穿戴式活动记录设备的开发。CRD42021232466。
Actigraphy is commonly used to record free living physical activity in both typically and atypically developing children. While the accuracy and reliability of actigraphy have been explored extensively, research regarding young people’s opinion towards these devices is scarce. This review aims to identify and synthesise evidence relating to the acceptability of actigraphic devices in 5–11 year olds. Database searches will be applied to Embase, MEDLINE, PsychInfo and Social Policy and Practice through the OVID interface; and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), British Education Index and CINAHL through the EBSCO interface from January 2018 until February 2023. Supplementary forward and backward citation and grey literature database searches, including Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC) and PsycEXTRA will be conducted. Qualitative and quantitative studies, excluding review articles and meta-analyses, will be eligible, without date restrictions. Article screening and data extraction will be undertaken by two review authors and disagreements will be deferred to a third reviewer. The primary outcome, actigraphic acceptability, will derive from the narrative synthesis of the main themes identified from included qualitative literature and pooled descriptive statistics relating to acceptability identified from quantitative literature. Subgroup analyses will determine if acceptability changes as a function of the key participant and actigraphic device factors. Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as it uses data from previously published literature. The results will be presented in a manuscript and published in a peer review journal and will be considered alongside a separate stream of codesign research to inform the development of a novel child-worn actigraphic device. CRD42021232466.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Kam HJ;Lee K;Cho SM;Shin YM;Park RW
通讯作者：
Park RW
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Mazza, Stephanie;Bastuji, Helene;Rey, Amandine E.
通讯作者：
Rey, Amandine E.
影响因子：
5
作者：
Mackintosh, Kelly A.;Chappel, Stephanie E.;Ridgers, Nicola D.
通讯作者：
Ridgers, Nicola D.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Fawkes DB;Malow BA;Weiss SK;Reynolds AM;Loh A;Adkins KW;Wofford DD;Wyatt AD;Goldman SE
通讯作者：
Goldman SE
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Hall CL;Taylor JA;Newell K;Baldwin L;Sayal K;Hollis C
通讯作者：
Hollis C