Green Political Strategy and the State
Green Political Strategy and the State
复制标题
绿色政治战略与国家
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Paterson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Paterson
绿色运动有一套不同的策略，从生态破坏到议会代表关于这些策略是否合适的争论在运动内部和学术评论家之间都在进行。在这场辩论和这些策略的背后，是一系列关于国家的态度和理论。这是我打算关注的关于国家的争论，因为它构成了可以评估不同策略的背景。一般来说，绿党对国家作为一种政治组织形式相当敌视。用鲍勃·古丁的话来说，“绿党基本上是无政府主义者和自由主义者”（1992，第152页）。即使是绿色运动中的大多数议员也经常支持这种敌意。德国绿党在绿党中最常被称为“反党党”，反映了这一立场（例如，参见Kelly， 1991）。然而，无论是在政治纲领中还是在绿色理论文本中，这种敌意往往是相当模糊的。虽然宣称有无政府主义倾向，但绿色计划在实践中往往包含对国家应该做什么的广泛建议。
The green movement has a set of diverse strategies, from ecosabotage through to parliamentary representation.1 Debates go on both within the movement and by academic commentators on the movement about the appropriateness of these strategies. Underlying this debate and the strategies is an array of attitudes to and theories about the state. It is the argument about the state which I propose to focus on, since it forms the context in which different strategies can be evaluated. In general, greens are fairly hostile to the state as a form of political organization. In Bob Goodin’s words, ‘Greens are basically anarchists-cum-libertarians’ (1992, p. 152). Even most parliamentarists in the green movement often espouse this hostility. The German greens have been most commonly among green parties known as an ‘anti-party party’, reflecting this position (see, for example, Kelly, 1991). However, both in political programmes and in green theoretical texts, this hostility is often rather ambiguous. While professing anarchistic tendencies, green programmes often contain in practice extensive proposals for what the state should do.