COMPARISON OF APPEARANCES OF CLOTH ILLUMINATED BY LED LIGHTING WITH THAT BY CONVENTIONAL LIGHTING
COMPARISON OF APPEARANCES OF CLOTH ILLUMINATED BY LED LIGHTING WITH THAT BY CONVENTIONAL LIGHTING
复制标题
LED 照明与传统照明照射下的布料外观对比
DOI：
10.3130/aije.75.569
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Iwata
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maiko Kusano;T. Iwata
这项研究的目的是确定在第一个实验中显示材料纹理的LED照明，以比较四个不同的灯，紧凑型荧光灯，白炽灯，两个LED（RA90，RA65）纹理样品包括缎面，la脚，皮革，大麻，绿色的大麻和羊毛，每盏灯都很大。 Scheffe的比较（URA版本）显示了订单效应，因此在第二个实验中，led2（RA65）被排除在外，因此显示了灯的显着效果（1％的显着性水平）”对于缎面，对缎面的质疑和la脚的“自然”质疑。
The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of LED lighting which show textures of materials. In the first experiment, in order to compare four different lamps, compact fluorescent lamp, incandescent lamp, two LEDs (Ra90, Ra65) are compared. Eight texture samples including satin, green satin, lame, leather, fur, hemp, green hemp and wool are illuminated by each lamp. The difference in luminance distribution between the texture is large, while the difference between the lamps is small. The results of the Scheffe's Paired Comparison (Ura's version) show the order effect and the combination effect. Therefore, in the second experiment, LED2 (Ra65) is excluded. As a result, significant effects (1% significance level) of the lamps are shown in Question ”preferable” for satin, Question ”shiny” and Question ”natural” for lame. Subjects identify the difference in the color of light between the lamps. It may be caused by the difference in duv.